Security report for quickbooks.com
Intuit Inc. · Finance · United States
QuickBooks, a product of Intuit Inc., is a leading provider of cloud-based accounting and financial management software targeted primarily at small to medium-sized businesses, accountants, and self-employed professionals. The website presents a professional and polished digital presence, reflecting its market leadership and extensive user base of over 7 million businesses. The business model is subscription-based SaaS, offering a suite of services including accounting, payroll, tax preparation, invoicing, and expense tracking. Intuit's strong brand recognition and multiple subsidiaries such as Mint, TurboTax, and Credit Karma further consolidate its position in the finance and technology sectors. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including React and Next.js frameworks, integrated with advanced analytics and marketing tools such as Adobe Experience Platform, Segment, and Qualtrics. The site is optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, ensuring a high-quality user experience. Security is robust with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and adherence to industry standards like ISO 27001 and SOC 2. Privacy compliance is well-managed with clear policies, GDPR adherence, and consent mechanisms via OneTrust. The security posture is strong, with no detected vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The domain WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical for large enterprises and justified given the business scale. The website maintains transparency with detailed security, privacy, and incident response information, including dedicated contact channels for security concerns. Overall, QuickBooks demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure, strong security culture, and high business credibility. Strategic recommendations include maintaining up-to-date third-party libraries, enhancing transparency on data retention, and continuous monitoring for emerging security threats to sustain trust and compliance in a dynamic regulatory environment.
Scanned
NIS2 and GDPR posture
- GDPR outside view
- 100/ 100 · Low
- Checks completed
- 6of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
- (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
- (b) Incident handling: One indicator
- (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
- (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
- (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
- (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
- (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
- (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
- (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
- (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.
SSL/TLS
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
- Critical
Unable to retrieve SSL certificate
Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information
What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured
- Critical
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
Keep watching quickbooks.com
This scan found 7 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended€25per month
- TLS certificates and expiry
- DNS records
- SPF, DKIM and DMARC
- Security headers
- GDPR and NIS2 posture
- Exposed services
- Third-party trackers
- Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
Full report
€39.90one-time
- The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
- Email delivery with an unlock code
- Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
- SSL/TLS
- 0
- Email security
- 80
- DNS health
- 90
- Network security
- 100
- GDPR outside view
- 100
- Average
- 74
Not counted
- Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
- NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
- OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
- The certificate is not trusted by browsers
- The website is not served over HTTPS
- A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
- The page loads a script from a compromised source
- The domain registration has expired
- SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
- Critical0–25
- High26–49
- Medium50–75
- Low76–100
Technical appendix
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Security posture
Recommendations
- Maintain regular updates and patching of all third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate emerging vulnerabilities.
- Enhance transparency and user communication regarding data retention policies and practices.
- Continue rigorous monitoring and auditing of security controls to ensure compliance with evolving standards.
- Invest in ongoing user education and awareness programs to reinforce security culture.
- Explore advanced threat detection and response capabilities to preemptively address sophisticated attacks.
Contact details published on the site
- Addresses
- Legal name
- Intuit Inc.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
- Company
- Intuit Inc.
- Description
- Organize & manage your business with the #1 rated solution. Fast & easy setup. Sign up for a free trial to join 7 million businesses already using QuickBooks.
- Key services
- Accounting software, Payroll services, Tax preparation, Invoicing, Expense tracking
- Content quality
- excellent
- Branding
- consistent
Technology
- Stack
- React, Next.js, Adobe Experience Platform, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust, LivePerson, Qualtrics, TikTok Pixel, Pinterest tracking, Snapchat tracking, Bing Ads, DoubleClick, Segment analytics
- Frameworks
- Next.js, React
- Platforms
- Web
- Performance
- fast
- Mobile
- excellent
- Accessibility
- good
- SEO
- excellent
Security
- Observed score
- 90/100
- Good practices seen
- HTTPS enforced
- Use of modern security headers
- Consent management with OneTrust
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Secure cookie attributes (SameSite, Secure)
Analytics and tracking
- Services
- Segment, Google Analytics (via GTM), Qualtrics, LivePerson
- Tracking level
- extensive
- Privacy practices
- good
Advertising
- Ad networks
- DoubleClick, Bing Ads, Facebook Ads, Reddit Ads, Pinterest Ads, TikTok Ads, Snapchat Ads
- Tracking pixels
- TikTok Pixel, Facebook Pixel, Pinterest Tracking, Reddit Pixel, Snapchat Pixel
- Marketing tools
- Qualtrics, LivePerson, Segment Analytics
- Transparency
- good
Site quality
- Design
- excellent
- User experience
- excellent
- Content relevance
- excellent
- Navigation
- excellent
- Professionalism
- excellent
- Trustworthiness
- high
Key observations
- Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
- Content is professional, well-structured, and targeted at small to medium businesses.
- Strong security and privacy compliance indicators including GDPR and cookie consent.
- Use of multiple modern analytics and marketing tools with transparent consent mechanisms.
- WHOIS data is not publicly available, consistent with privacy protection for enterprise domains.
- No suspicious or malicious content detected.
- Comprehensive security headers and HTTPS enforced.
- Multiple certifications and security policies publicly referenced.
Technical notes
Notes
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
- MITRE CWE (opens in a new tab)4.20 (2026-04-30) · CWE Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP Top 10:2025 (opens in a new tab)2025 (membership per CWE 4.20) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- MITRE CAPEC (opens in a new tab)3.9 (2023-01-24) · CAPEC Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP ASVS (opens in a new tab)5.0.0 · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (opens in a new tab)latest (checklist.json, master) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Secure Headers Project (opens in a new tab)2026-10-18 · Apache-2.0
- Mozilla Server Side TLS (intermediate) (opens in a new tab)6.0 · MPL-2.0
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 (OSCAL catalog) (opens in a new tab)5.2.0 · Public domain (US Government work)
- Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 333, 27.12.2022 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 (opens in a new tab)OJ L, 18.10.2024 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 119, 4.5.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy), consolidated (opens in a new tab)19.12.2009 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- RFC Editor metadata (opens in a new tab)per-RFC (obsolete RFCs rejected) · IETF Trust Legal Provisions (metadata only)
- NIST CSRC, W3C TR, IETF Datatracker, EDPB, EUR-Lex CELLAR and gesetze-bayern.de (opens in a new tab)per document · Titles and links only
- NIST NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens in a new tab)live records · Public domain (NVD); CVE® records © MITRE, free use
- W3C WCAG 2.2 (opens in a new tab)W3C Recommendation (wcag.json) · W3C Software and Document License
- ETSI EN 301 549 (opens in a new tab)V3.2.1 (2021-03), clause headings · Clause numbers and titles only (© ETSI)
- Directive (EU) 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 151, 7.6.2019 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive (EU) 2016/2102 (Web Accessibility Directive) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 327, 2.12.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Feedback on this report
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with quickbooks.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review quickbooks.com.