Skip to main content

Security report for qscangroup.com.au

Qscan Services Pty Ltd · Healthcare · Australia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Qscan Services Pty Ltd is a leading Australian healthcare provider specializing in medical imaging and radiology services. The company operates a large network of clinics across multiple states, offering interventional radiology, diagnostic reporting, and clinical trials. Their partnerships with elite sporting teams further reinforce their market position and brand trust. The website is professionally designed using Drupal CMS, hosted with AWS for media assets, and incorporates modern technologies such as Bootstrap and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, providing a positive user experience. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though improvements can be made by adding security headers and incident response information. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but lacking cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, indicating legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching qscangroup.com.au

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Qscan Group holds a strong position in the Australian healthcare sector, focusing on radiology and medical imaging. Their business model revolves around providing specialized diagnostic services through a wide network of clinics and leveraging partnerships with professional sports teams to enhance brand visibility. The company employs over 1300 staff and operates multiple subsidiaries, reflecting a large enterprise scale. Revenue streams likely include patient services, clinical trials, and contracts with hospitals and sports organizations. The website content and structure support clear communication to patients and healthcare professionals, facilitating appointment bookings and career opportunities. The partnership ecosystem is robust, indicating strategic collaborations that enhance market reach and credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security hardening. There is no public vulnerability disclosure or incident response contact information, which could hinder timely reporting and mitigation of security incidents. The lack of a cookie consent mechanism may also pose compliance risks under privacy regulations. No vulnerable libraries or insecure scripts were detected. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by implementing recommended best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve defense-in-depth.
  2. Add a publicly accessible vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  4. Publish incident response contact details such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses to enhance transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Qscan Services Pty Ltd
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Qscan Services Pty Ltd
Description
Qscan offers a range of interventional radiology services, outstanding patient care, and exceptionally accurate diagnostic radiology reports. They operate multiple radiology clinics across Australia and provide services including medical imaging, radiology reporting, and clinical trials.
Key services
Interventional radiology, Diagnostic radiology reports, Medical imaging, Clinical trials
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal CMS, Bootstrap Icons, Google Tag Manager, JavaScript, Slick Slider
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
AWS S3 (for media hosting)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is comprehensive and relevant to healthcare and radiology services.
  3. Multiple clinic locations and subsidiaries are clearly presented.
  4. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn.
  5. No cookie consent mechanism detected, which may impact privacy compliance.
  6. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts found.
  7. Use of modern technologies and CMS (Drupal) with AWS hosting for media.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal CMS, leveraging Bootstrap for responsive design and AWS S3 for media hosting, indicating a modern and scalable infrastructure. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics, enabling flexible tracking capabilities. The site loads with moderate performance, likely due to rich media content and slider components. Accessibility features such as skip links and responsive layouts are implemented, enhancing usability. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and canonical links. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to optimize performance further and enhance security configurations. Overall, the technical foundation supports a professional and user-friendly digital presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with qscangroup.com.au. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review qscangroup.com.au.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.