Skip to main content

Security report for qondor.com

Qondor · Hospitality · Norway

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Qondor is a well-established SaaS platform specializing in meetings and events management, primarily serving the MICE industry. Founded in 2006, it offers a comprehensive suite of tools including project management, budgeting, invoicing, attendee management, and sustainability reporting. The company positions itself as a trusted partner for event professionals, supported by strong customer testimonials and ISO 27001 certification, underscoring its commitment to data security and compliance. Technically, the website is built on the HubSpot CMS platform, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and Google Analytics 4 for data insights. The site is fast, mobile-optimized, and accessible, with clear navigation and professional design. Privacy compliance is robust, featuring a comprehensive privacy policy, cookie consent mechanisms, and GDPR adherence. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, employs domain transfer protections, and holds ISO 27001 certification, indicating mature security practices. However, some standard security headers are not explicitly detected and could be improved. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The WHOIS data aligns well with the business claims, showing a long-standing domain without privacy protection, enhancing trust. Overall, Qondor presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility, technical maturity, and privacy compliance. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing an incident response contact, and adding a vulnerability disclosure policy to further strengthen security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching qondor.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
45
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention qondor.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
51
Employees
0
Customers
51
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
2%

10 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for qondor.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Qondor operates in the niche market of event and meeting management software, targeting travel management companies, event agencies, venues, and conference hotels. Its SaaS model focuses on streamlining complex event workflows, reducing manual errors, and improving client experiences. The company leverages partnerships and integrations to extend platform capabilities. Customer testimonials and industry certifications position Qondor as a competitive player in the hospitality technology sector. The company’s digital presence is professional and content-rich, supporting lead generation and customer engagement effectively.

Security posture

Qondor demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, domain transfer lock, and ISO 27001 certification. The presence of cookie consent and privacy policies indicates compliance with GDPR. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. Incident response contact information and a vulnerability disclosure policy are not publicly available, which could be addressed to enhance transparency and readiness. Overall, the security culture appears strong but could benefit from additional formalized disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  2. Publish a dedicated incident response page with security contact information.
  3. Create and host a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Regularly review and update cookie consent mechanisms to maintain GDPR compliance.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing more detailed data retention and privacy practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Qondor
Description
Qondor is an all-in-one platform designed for meetings and events professionals to streamline sales, planning, budgeting, and reporting to deliver better events. It is built specifically for the MICE industry including travel management companies, event agencies, DMCs, venues, and conference hotels.
Key services
Project management, Budget and proposals, Invoicing and reconciliation, Attendee management, Sustainability reporting, Reporting and business intelligence, Integrations
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, HubSpot CMS, Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
HubSpot CMS
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • ISO 27001 certification
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics 4, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
HubSpot Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Ads Pixel, Google Analytics 4
Marketing tools
HubSpot Marketing
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is comprehensive and targeted to the MICE industry.
  3. Strong trust signals including ISO certification and customer testimonials.
  4. Good privacy and cookie compliance with consent mechanisms.
  5. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools with consent management.
  6. No security or content blocking detected.
  7. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-term operation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on HubSpot CMS, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries and Google Analytics 4 for tracking. It is well-optimized for performance and mobile devices, with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting appears to be managed by HubSpot, ensuring reliable uptime and scalability. The technical implementation is clean with no broken elements detected. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and formalize vulnerability disclosure processes. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with qondor.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review qondor.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.