Skip to main content

Security report for pyth.network

Pyth Network · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pyth Network operates as a financial technology platform providing real-time price data feeds to unify fragmented financial markets. The website positions itself as a critical infrastructure layer for global finance, targeting builders, traders, and innovators who require timely and accurate market data. The business model centers on delivering comprehensive price information to enable better financial decision-making and innovation. The site content is professional and well-branded, reflecting a medium-sized technology-focused enterprise in the finance sector. Technically, the website is built using the Framer CMS platform, leveraging modern web fonts and Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and moderate performance. However, it lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which are important for compliance and trust in the finance industry. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration, but the absence of security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerabilities were detected in the provided content. The WHOIS data is privacy-protected or unavailable, which is common but limits full trust verification. Overall, the website presents a credible and professional front for a fintech business but should enhance its privacy, security policies, and contact transparency to improve compliance and user trust. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and providing clear contact channels for security incidents.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pyth.network

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pyth Network is positioned as a key player in the financial data infrastructure space, offering real-time price feeds that serve a niche of developers, traders, and financial innovators. Its competitive advantage lies in uniting fragmented market data into a single accessible layer. The business likely generates revenue through data services or partnerships with financial institutions and blockchain projects. The target customers are technologically savvy market participants requiring reliable and fast price data. The company appears to be medium-sized with a focus on technology and finance sectors. The absence of explicit parent or subsidiary information suggests it operates independently or as a startup. The partnership ecosystem is not detailed but external domains indicate use of standard analytics and hosting services.

Security posture

The current security posture shows a baseline maturity with HTTPS enabled and no obvious data leaks. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are published, which is a gap in security culture and readiness. Compliance with GDPR or other privacy regulations is not demonstrated due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The use of Google Analytics without visible consent mechanisms may pose privacy compliance risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements in policy transparency, security controls, and incident readiness to meet industry standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish detailed privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance statements and cookie consent mechanisms.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy and security incident contact information.
  4. Add clear company contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain a strong security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pyth Network
Description
The financial system is fragmented. Pyth is uniting markets—giving every builder, trader, and innovator access to the price of everything, in real time.
Key services
real-time price data feeds, financial market data infrastructure
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Framer CMS, Web Fonts (Inter, Manrope, Fragment Mono)
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy or malformed request; no registrant info found.
  3. No explicit contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the HTML content.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected on the main page content.
  5. Uses Google Analytics for tracking; no cookie consent mechanism detected.
  6. Website built with Framer CMS and uses modern web fonts and technologies.
  7. SSL is enabled and appears properly configured.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data; recommend adding for improved security.
  9. Content is finance and technology focused, targeting developers and market participants.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security incident contact information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Framer CMS platform, utilizing modern web fonts and Google Analytics for tracking. The HTML structure is valid and SEO optimized with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. Mobile optimization is good, ensuring usability across devices. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy compliance mechanisms. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. There is an opportunity to improve technical robustness by integrating security best practices and enhancing privacy controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pyth.network. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pyth.network.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.