Skip to main content

Security report for pxe.cz

Power Exchange Central Europe, a.s. · Energy · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Power Exchange Central Europe, a.s. (PXE) operates as a regional energy commodity exchange focused on the Central European market, primarily the Czech Republic and Slovakia. It provides market participants with trading platforms, market data, and commodity price information, serving large consumers and traders in the energy sector. The company is part of the EEX Group, which enhances its market position and credibility. The website reflects a professional and well-structured digital presence, offering comprehensive market data, news, and trading information. The target audience includes energy market participants, large consumers, and traders seeking transparent and efficient commodity exchange services. Technically, the website is built on modern web technologies including Angular 12, uses Google Tag Manager for analytics, and integrates third-party widgets for market data visualization. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO and accessibility practices, although accessibility could be further improved. Performance is moderate, with a clean and consistent design that supports user navigation and engagement. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, implements key security headers such as Content Security Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, and uses a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. However, explicit security policies, incident response information, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not published, representing areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected, and the domain registration data supports the legitimacy and trustworthiness of the business. Overall, PXE's website presents a secure, professional, and business-credible platform that effectively supports its role as a regional energy exchange. Strategic enhancements in security transparency and accessibility would further strengthen its digital maturity and stakeholder trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pxe.cz

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
85
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PXE holds a strong market position as a regional energy commodity exchange under the EEX Group umbrella. Its business model revolves around providing transparent trading platforms and market data services to energy market participants, including large consumers and traders. Revenue streams likely include trading fees, data services, and platform access. The company targets institutional and commercial clients in the energy sector, with growth indicators tied to regional energy market developments and digital platform adoption. Partnerships with related platforms such as parc, priceindex, and parc4u expand its ecosystem and service offerings. The website content and structure reflect a mature business with clear market focus and professional communication.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. The use of Content Security Policy and Strict-Transport-Security headers reduces risks of common web attacks. However, the absence of publicly available security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure programs limits transparency and may affect stakeholder confidence. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The site uses third-party scripts responsibly, but continuous monitoring is recommended. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized security communication.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information page to improve transparency.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with WCAG standards and improve user inclusivity.
  4. Provide direct company contact emails and phone numbers for support and security reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Power Exchange Central Europe, a.s.
Description
Aktuální informace a grafy z komoditní burzy, přehled trhů, kurzovní lístek a novinky z trhu komodit. Snadné obchodování na burze pro každého.
Key services
Derivatives market trading, Commodity market data, Market information services, Trading platforms (parc, priceindex, parc4u)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 12, Google Tag Manager, Owl Carousel, Moment.js
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy present
  • Cookie consent with denied ad and analytics storage by default

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Clear focus on energy commodity markets in Central Europe.
  3. Good use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the main HTML; contact likely via contact page forms.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. External links mostly to partner or related service domains.
  10. Google Tag Manager used for analytics and tracking with consent denied by default.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Angular 12, indicating a modern single-page application framework. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, and uses Owl Carousel and Moment.js for UI components and date/time handling. The site is hosted with a Czech registrar (Active24) and uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration. Performance is moderate with responsive design supporting mobile devices. SEO is well addressed with appropriate meta tags and structured navigation. Technical debt appears low, but accessibility and explicit performance optimization could be improved. The technology stack supports scalability and maintainability for the business needs.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pxe.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pxe.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.