Skip to main content

Security report for pwc.com

PricewaterhouseCoopers · Finance · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) is a global professional services firm specializing in audit, consulting, tax, and technology solutions. The website reflects PwC's market position as a leading enterprise service provider, targeting businesses and government entities worldwide. The site content emphasizes the integration of expertise and technology to help clients outperform in their industries. Technically, the website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and Adobe's tag management system, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, providing a professional user experience. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, employs cookie consent mechanisms, and integrates CSRF protections, demonstrating a strong security posture. However, explicit security policies and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly visible, representing an area for improvement. Overall, the site is trustworthy, compliant with GDPR, and professionally maintained, with a high AI-assessed quality and security score.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 29 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pwc.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PwC operates in the finance and consulting sectors with a global footprint and enterprise-scale operations. The business model focuses on delivering professional services including audit, tax, consulting, and technology advisory. The website targets corporate clients and government agencies, emphasizing digital transformation and expertise integration. PwC's brand consistency and trust signals such as ISO 27001 certification reinforce its market leadership. The company maintains multiple regional domains reflecting its global presence. The lack of publicly available WHOIS data is consistent with privacy protection practices for large enterprises. The website's analytics and marketing tools indicate a sophisticated approach to user engagement and data-driven insights.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, security headers, and cookie consent compliance. The use of CSRF protection scripts and absence of exposed sensitive data indicate good security hygiene. However, the absence of a public security policy page, vulnerability disclosure program, or security.txt file limits transparency for security researchers and users. Incident response contact information is not prominently available, which could hinder timely reporting of security issues. Overall, the site is secure for users but could enhance its security culture and transparency by publishing explicit security policies and disclosure channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Enhance visibility of incident response contacts for security issue reporting.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to reflect evolving regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Description
We unite expertise and tech so you can outthink, outpace and outperform​.
Key services
Audit and Assurance, Consulting, Tax Services, Technology Solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Adobe DTM, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Handlebars, Purify.js, JWPlayer
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM)
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • Use of CSRF protection scripts
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Adobe Analytics, LinkedIn Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Adobe DTM
Marketing tools
Adobe DTM, OneTrust
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong privacy and cookie compliance with OneTrust integration.
  3. Use of Adobe Experience Manager CMS and Adobe DTM for analytics and tag management.
  4. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security vulnerabilities detected.
  5. WHOIS data is privacy protected or unavailable, typical for large corporate domains.
  6. No signs of WAF blocking or security challenge pages.
  7. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, a robust enterprise CMS, and uses modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery, Handlebars, and Purify.js for dynamic content and security. Adobe DTM is used for tag management and analytics integration, complemented by LinkedIn Insight tags and OneTrust for cookie consent management. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident from meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate, likely due to rich content and multiple external scripts. Hosting details are not explicitly identified but likely leverage enterprise-grade infrastructure. Technical risks are minimal, with opportunities to improve by reducing third-party dependencies and enhancing security transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100Low19 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pwc.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pwc.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.