Skip to main content

Security report for pwc.com.br

PricewaterhouseCoopers · Finance · Brazil

Partial score · DNS & email only

73/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PwC Brasil is the Brazilian branch of PricewaterhouseCoopers, a leading global professional services firm specializing in auditing, tax consulting, business consulting, and transaction advisory services. The website targets businesses and organizations in Brazil seeking high-quality professional services. The company holds a strong market position as part of a global network and offers a comprehensive portfolio of services tailored to the Brazilian market. Technically, the website is built on Adobe Experience Manager CMS and integrates a mature digital marketing and analytics infrastructure, including Adobe Dynamic Tag Manager, Google Tag Manager, and multiple social media pixels. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO and accessibility practices, although some accessibility features could be enhanced. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent via OneTrust, indicating compliance with privacy regulations. However, explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident. The domain registration is consistent with a legitimate enterprise, using CSC DNS services common for corporate domains. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy digital presence with room for improvement in privacy policy transparency, contact information availability, and security best practices documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pwc.com.br

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
73

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pwc.com.br, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
100%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for pwc.com.br.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PwC Brasil operates as an essential entity within the finance sector, providing auditing, tax, consulting, and transaction advisory services. Its business model focuses on delivering professional services to enterprises and organizations in Brazil. The company benefits from its global brand and network, which enhances its competitive advantage and market positioning. The website reflects a strategic digital presence with extensive use of analytics and marketing tools, indicating a focus on customer engagement and lead generation. Although direct contact information is not visible in the provided content, the brand's reputation and global footprint support its credibility. The absence of explicit privacy and security policies suggests an opportunity to strengthen compliance and customer trust further.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place. The use of CSRF protection scripts and absence of visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data are positive indicators. However, the lack of visible security headers and absence of published security policies or incident response contacts represent gaps in security transparency and readiness. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, which could be improved to foster responsible vulnerability reporting. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a professional services firm but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and public documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Add explicit security policies and incident response contact information to enhance trust and readiness.
  3. Deploy and verify security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Description
Prestação de serviços de qualidade em auditoria e asseguração, consultoria tributária e societária, consultoria de negócios e assessoria em transações.
Key services
Auditoria e asseguração, Consultoria tributária e societária, Consultoria de negócios, Assessoria em transações
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Adobe Dynamic Tag Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Google Tag Manager, TikTok Pixel, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Universal Website Tag, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Handlebars.js, Purify.js, JW Player
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by canonical URLs
  • Use of CSRF protection script
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Adobe Analytics (AppMeasurement), TikTok Analytics, Facebook Analytics, Twitter Analytics, LinkedIn Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
TikTok, Google Ads, Facebook Ads, Twitter Ads, LinkedIn Ads
Tracking pixels
TikTok Pixel, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Universal Website Tag, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Adobe Dynamic Tag Manager
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and localized for Brazil (language: Portuguese)
  2. Strong use of marketing and analytics tools indicating mature digital marketing strategy
  3. Cookie consent implemented via OneTrust with clear consent mechanism
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in the provided HTML content
  5. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the provided content
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information
  7. Use of Adobe Experience Manager CMS and multiple third-party tracking scripts
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected, full content accessible
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager CMS, leveraging a modern tech stack including jQuery, Handlebars.js, and Purify.js. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing platforms such as Adobe Analytics, Google Tag Manager, TikTok Pixel, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Tag, and LinkedIn Insight Tag, indicating a sophisticated digital marketing strategy. Hosting is managed via CSC DNS, a reputable provider for corporate domains. Performance is moderate, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site uses CSRF protection and cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks visible security headers and explicit security documentation. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist for modernization in security and privacy transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pwc.com.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pwc.com.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.