Skip to main content

Security report for pusyno.lt

Meliva Pušyno klinika · Healthcare · Lithuania

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Meliva Pušyno klinika is a Lithuanian healthcare clinic offering specialized medical consultations and personal health care services. The website targets both local Lithuanian and international clients seeking high-quality healthcare. The business emphasizes professionalism, patient respect, and uses advanced medical equipment with over 14 years of experience. The website is built on WordPress, leveraging common plugins such as Yoast SEO and Contact Form 7, and integrates Google Analytics and Cookiebot for analytics and cookie consent management. The site is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and provides a good user experience, although explicit privacy and terms of service pages are not detected in the provided content. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent, but additional security headers and policies could improve the security maturity. The WHOIS data shows a suspicious domain creation date in the future, which conflicts with the claimed business history and reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the site is professional and safe but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pusyno.lt

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
83
Average
50
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The clinic positions itself as a leading healthcare provider in Lithuania with a focus on quality and patient care. Its business model revolves around direct healthcare services, targeting individuals seeking medical consultations and treatments. The website content and metadata indicate a clear market positioning as a trusted clinic with experienced staff. The use of Google Analytics and Cookiebot suggests an awareness of digital marketing and compliance requirements. However, the lack of visible contact details and privacy policies may limit customer trust and regulatory compliance. The domain registration inconsistency suggests a need for better alignment between digital assets and business claims. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism, indicating baseline security and privacy compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap. No incident response or security policy pages are found, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are published. The site does not expose sensitive data in the HTML, and no vulnerable libraries are detected. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing additional headers, publishing security policies, and establishing incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to enhance transparency and compliance.
  2. Implement additional HTTP security headers to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  3. Add a security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update all plugins and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Meliva Pušyno klinika
Description
Vizija būti pirmu pasirinkimu kiekvienam Lietuvos ir užsienio klientams, siekiančiam gauti aukščiausios kokybės asmens sveikatos priežiūros paslaugas. Misija maksimaliai greitai, saugiai ir efektyviai pasirūpinti gyventojų sveikata, panaudojant klinikos 14 metų patirtį, kvalifikuotą personalą bei pažangią medicinos įrangą. Vertybės nuoširdus dėmesys ir pagarba kiekvienam pacientui, profesionalumas, aukšta paslaugų kokybė, veiklos skaidrumas, aukšta gydytojų, slaugytojų, masažuotojų kompetencija.
Key services
Gydytojų specialistų konsultacijos, Asmens sveikatos priežiūros paslaugos, Masažo paslaugos
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (UA-165854162-1)
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a healthcare clinic site with professional design and content in Lithuanian.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie information.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content provided.
  5. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins like Yoast SEO and Contact Form 7.
  6. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for analytics and marketing.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content is accessible.
  8. WHOIS data shows domain creation date in the future, which is suspicious and may indicate placeholder or error.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  10. No explicit security or incident response policies published on site.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for cookie management. The site uses Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and Google Fonts for typography. Performance is moderate with mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. Hosting appears to be managed via Lithuanian name servers, but the exact hosting provider is not identified. The domain's WHOIS data shows an anomalous creation date in the future, which is a technical inconsistency. The site lacks some advanced security headers and explicit privacy documentation, indicating areas for technical improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pusyno.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pusyno.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.