Skip to main content

Security report for pussyspace.com

Media · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PussySpace is an adult entertainment website specializing in free streaming of explicit pussy porn videos, XXX sex clips, and hardcore movies. The site targets adult users seeking free, high-quality adult content with frequent updates and a variety of categories including amateurs, MILFs, and lesbian scenes. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, and integrates Google Analytics for user tracking. It is mobile-friendly and offers a good user experience with clear navigation and video categorization. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS but lacks important security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are areas for improvement. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency. Overall, the site functions well as a niche adult content platform but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pussyspace.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pussyspace.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
284
Employees
0
Customers
236
Third parties
48
Weak passwords
17%

7 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for pussyspace.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a free adult content tube site monetized likely through advertising. It serves a niche market of adult viewers interested in pussy-centric pornographic content. The business model relies on high traffic volume and frequent content updates to maintain user engagement. The site links to external domains for video hosting and includes a live webcam section and adult dating links, indicating diversified adult entertainment offerings. Lack of clear company information and WHOIS transparency limits trust and business credibility. The site appears small in scale but professionally maintained with moderate branding consistency.

Security posture

The website has a valid SSL certificate and enforces HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could expose it to clickjacking, MIME sniffing, and other attacks. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism and privacy compliance indicators suggests GDPR compliance gaps. No incident response or security contact information is published, limiting the site's readiness for security incidents. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
  5. Improve WHOIS registration transparency or use a reputable privacy protection service with verifiable registrant information to increase trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
PussySpace is a free adult entertainment website offering a large library of pussy porn videos, XXX sex clips, and hardcore pussy movies in HD. The site targets adult users interested in explicit adult content, including categories such as amateurs, MILFs, lesbian encounters, and hardcore scenes. It provides free access without membership or paywalls and updates content daily.
Key services
free streaming of adult videos, video search and categorization, live webcam broadcasts, adult dating link
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, Google Analytics, jQuery, Unveil.js (lazy loading), Custom JS scripts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a free adult content tube site specializing in pussy porn videos.
  2. Content is updated frequently with new videos.
  3. No WHOIS registration data available, raising legitimacy concerns.
  4. No visible security headers implemented.
  5. HTTPS is enforced with valid SSL certificate.
  6. Privacy and terms pages exist but cookie consent is missing.
  7. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found.
  8. Site uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking.
  9. External domains include suspicious or unknown domains likely related to video hosting or CDN.
  10. No social media links or official company information present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard technology stack with HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, including jQuery and lazy loading libraries for performance optimization. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for user behavior tracking. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting details are not explicitly identified, but multiple subdomains serve static content and video thumbnails. Performance is moderate with some asynchronous script loading. There is no detected CMS or framework, suggesting a custom or lightweight platform. Technical debt appears low but security and privacy technical implementations need improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pussyspace.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pussyspace.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.