Skip to main content

Security report for pushthebrand.com

Push The Brand - Agence de communication · Media · France

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Push The Brand is a French communication agency specializing in branding, advertising campaigns, media and digital strategy, print design, and event management. The company targets businesses seeking creative and comprehensive communication solutions. Their website showcases a portfolio of diverse clients and projects, indicating a solid market presence in the media sector. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frameworks such as Bootstrap and uses popular analytics and marketing tools like Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and implements GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks visible security headers and published security policies. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a concern and should be investigated further to confirm domain legitimacy. Overall, the website demonstrates a good level of digital maturity and business credibility but could improve in security transparency and contact information completeness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Cloudflare, Google APIs, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pushthebrand.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The agency operates in the media and communication sector, offering essential branding and advertising services. Their business model is service-based, focusing on creative campaigns and strategic media planning. The portfolio indicates a small-sized company with a focus on quality and client diversity. The company maintains active social media profiles on Twitter, LinkedIn, and Facebook, enhancing their market reach and engagement. The lack of phone contact and detailed company registration information limits full business transparency. There are no detected partnerships or subsidiaries from the website data. The agency appears to be well-positioned for clients seeking integrated communication services in France.

Security posture

The website has a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place, indicating compliance with GDPR. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is published, which may impact trust for security-conscious clients. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The lack of WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration transparency. Overall, the security maturity is adequate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against web attacks.
  2. Verify and publish domain registration details to enhance trust and transparency.
  3. Add phone contact information to improve business credibility and customer support accessibility.
  4. Publish a terms of service page and security policy to inform users and clients about legal and security practices.
  5. Consider creating a security.txt file and incident response contact to improve security posture and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Push The Brand - Agence de communication
Description
Branding, conception et création de campagnes publicitaires, stratégie médias et digitale, print design, évènementiel.
Key services
Branding, Advertising campaigns, Media strategy, Digital strategy, Print design, Event management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Bootstrap 4.4.1, jQuery 3.5.0, FontAwesome 5.6.3, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Owl Carousel 2.3.4, WPBakery Page Builder, Complianz GDPR plugin
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional communication agency portfolio
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual
  3. Uses modern web technologies and analytics
  4. Implements GDPR-compliant cookie consent
  5. No visible security headers detected
  6. No contact phone numbers found, only email and contact form
  7. No terms of service page found
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with WPBakery Page Builder and Bootstrap 4.4.1 framework, ensuring responsive design and modern UI components. It leverages jQuery 3.5.0 and FontAwesome 5.6.3 for interactive and iconographic elements. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for marketing and analytics purposes. The site loads external resources from trusted CDNs such as Cloudflare and Google Fonts. Performance is moderate, with some room for optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). No critical technical debt or outdated libraries were detected, but security headers are missing which is a technical risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pushthebrand.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pushthebrand.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.