Skip to main content

Security report for purple-technology.com

Purple Technology s.r.o. · Finance · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Purple Technology s.r.o. is a Czech Republic-based FinTech company specializing in developing and managing online trading technology solutions for FX, CFD, and investment brokers worldwide. Established in 2011, the company supports tens of thousands of traders and handles significant daily trading volumes. Their services include web app development, trading server management, risk management, business intelligence, marketing solutions, end-user support, HR services, and payment solutions. The company operates under the Purple Holding group and maintains a professional online presence with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies. Technically, the website employs common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Parallax.js, and Slick Carousel, with a moderate performance profile and good mobile optimization. The site lacks a CMS and shows no signs of hosting provider information. Accessibility is basic, and SEO practices are good. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and explicit incident response contacts. Cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies indicate GDPR compliance. The security posture is moderate with room for improvement, especially in implementing security headers and publishing vulnerability disclosure information. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces trustworthiness from a domain registration perspective, but the website content and business information appear legitimate and professional. Contact information is clear, including company emails, phone numbers, and a physical address in Brno, Czech Republic. Overall, Purple Technology presents as a credible and professional FinTech technology provider with a solid digital presence but would benefit from enhanced security practices and transparency in domain registration details.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching purple-technology.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
70
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Purple Technology holds a strong position in the FinTech sector, focusing on B2B solutions for online trading platforms. Their competitive advantage lies in their long-standing experience since 2011 and a comprehensive suite of services tailored to FX and investment brokers. The company targets brokers and financial institutions requiring robust trading technology and support. Revenue streams likely derive from software development, server management, and support services. The partnership ecosystem includes notable clients such as Fintokei and Purple Trading, indicating a well-established network. The company emphasizes a people-oriented culture and innovation, which supports sustainable growth and client retention.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enabled, and cookie consent mechanisms are in place, supporting privacy compliance. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder timely security issue reporting. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerable libraries but would benefit from regular security audits and enhanced transparency. GDPR compliance is indicated through privacy policies and cookie management. Overall, the security culture appears positive but could be strengthened with formalized incident response and vulnerability disclosure processes.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish clear incident response contact information and establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  3. Conduct regular third-party library vulnerability assessments and update dependencies accordingly.
  4. Improve website accessibility to meet WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.
  5. Enhance domain registration transparency by ensuring WHOIS data is complete and publicly available.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Purple Technology s.r.o.
Registration number
29364973
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Purple Technology s.r.o.
Description
Purple Technology builds, manages and innovates online trading technology solutions for FX, CFD and investment brokers, enabling tens of thousands of traders worldwide to trade billions of dollars monthly.
Key services
Web Apps Development, Trading Server Management, Risk Management, Business Intelligence, Marketing Solutions, 24/5 End-User Support, HR Services, Payment Solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.0, Parallax.js 3.1.0, Slick Carousel 1.8.1, Sammy.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner with detailed settings
  • Privacy policy and whistleblower policy published

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy blocking.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms implemented.
  4. Contact information is clear and includes emails, phone numbers, and physical address in Czech Republic.
  5. No visible security headers detected; security posture could be improved.
  6. No forms detected on the homepage; no direct data collection forms present.
  7. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. Website uses common JavaScript libraries and external CDNs.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern but lightweight technology stack with popular JavaScript libraries for UI effects and carousel functionality. It does not rely on a CMS, indicating a custom or static site approach. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization especially in loading external resources. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO practices are adequately implemented with proper meta tags and structured content. The absence of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks. Hosting provider details are not disclosed, which limits infrastructure transparency. Overall, the technical implementation supports business needs but could be improved in security and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with purple-technology.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review purple-technology.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.