Skip to main content

Security report for puorzlin.cz

Pilsner Urquell Restaurant Zlín · Hospitality · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pilsner Urquell Restaurant Zlín is a hospitality business operating a restaurant in Zlín, Czech Republic, specializing in traditional Czech cuisine complemented by Pilsner Urquell beer. The restaurant targets local and visiting customers seeking authentic Czech dining experiences with a capacity of 112 indoor seats and 48 outdoor seats. The website reflects a well-branded and consistent digital presence with clear business information and social media integration. However, the absence of WHOIS data limits verification of domain legitimacy. Technically, the website employs a modern frontend stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and various UI libraries, built on the Smarty CMS platform. It is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. The site uses HTTPS and includes a cookie consent mechanism, but lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or terms of service pages. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates basic good practices such as HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent but lacks advanced security headers and documented policies. The missing WHOIS data is a notable risk factor, reducing overall trustworthiness. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Privacy compliance is partial due to missing privacy policy documentation. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and suitable for its business purpose but would benefit from improved transparency in domain registration, enhanced security headers, and formal privacy and terms policies to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching puorzlin.cz

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The restaurant operates in the hospitality sector with a niche focus on Czech traditional cuisine and Pilsner Urquell beer, leveraging the brand association with Plzeňský Prazdroj. Its market position is strong locally as one of the best gastronomic venues in Zlín. The business model centers on dine-in services with daily and permanent menu offerings, targeting local residents and tourists. Revenue streams likely include food and beverage sales, including specialty beer offerings. The company maintains active social media channels to engage customers and promote its brand. The lack of WHOIS data and formal privacy policies suggests areas for operational improvement, especially in digital trust and compliance. No subsidiaries or partner domains were identified, indicating a focused standalone operation.

Security posture

The website's security posture is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. The presence of a cookie consent banner indicates awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No forms were detected, minimizing attack surface from input vectors. The missing WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy and could indicate privacy protection or registration issues. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting readiness for security events. Overall, the site follows basic security hygiene but lacks advanced measures and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Add a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement essential security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against web attacks.
  3. Publish terms of service and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data to ensure domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pilsner Urquell Restaurant Zlín
Description
Restaurace konceptu PUOR ve Zlíně. Restaurace nabízí pokrmy z jídelního lístku i polední menu. Tradiční českou kuchyni doplňují speciality k pivu a z grilu. Otevřeno máme denně, kapacita restaurace je 112 míst a dalších 48 je k dispozici na letní zahrádce.
Key services
restaurant dining, daily menu, traditional Czech cuisine, specialties with beer and grill, summer garden seating
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Flexslider, Magnific Popup, Toastr, SweetAlert2, Ion RangeSlider, autocomplete.js, cookieconsent
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • cookie consent banner implemented
  • no exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via gtag.js)
Marketing tools
Toastr notifications
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on a local restaurant with clear business information.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and functional.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  6. Website uses modern frontend libraries and is mobile optimized.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  8. Contact information is clearly presented in footer and header.
  9. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is active.
  10. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Smarty CMS with a frontend stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and various UI enhancement libraries such as Flexslider and Magnific Popup. It uses Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking, with a cookie consent mechanism implemented via a third-party library. The site is mobile optimized and loads a background video on the homepage, indicating moderate performance demands. No backend or hosting provider information was detected. The absence of security headers and WHOIS data are technical gaps. Overall, the technical implementation is modern and functional but could benefit from improved security configurations and documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with puorzlin.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review puorzlin.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.