Skip to main content

Security report for pulse-clinic.com

PULSE CLINIC · Healthcare · Thailand

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PULSE CLINIC is a healthcare provider specializing in sexual health services across Asia, with a focus on HIV prevention, STD/STI testing and treatment, and related medical services. The website presents a professional and content-rich platform highlighting their extensive branch network and specialized offerings. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Next.js, React, and integrates analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. Security posture is generally strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies, and no explicit contact information is provided. WHOIS data is missing, raising concerns about domain legitimacy despite the professional appearance. Overall, the site is functional and well-designed but requires enhancements in privacy transparency and domain registration clarity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pulse-clinic.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business positions itself as a leading sexual healthcare network in Asia, targeting individuals seeking HIV prevention and sexual health services. Their business model includes physical clinics and online telemedicine services, catering to a diverse international clientele. The presence of multiple branches across countries and specialized services like PCR DNA testing and bodybuilder health checks indicate a medium-sized enterprise with a strong market presence. The lack of publicly available registrant data and privacy policies may affect trust among privacy-conscious customers. The company leverages digital marketing and tracking tools to engage users but should improve transparency to align with regulatory expectations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or security policy information is available, which limits user confidence in handling security events. The use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts without clear privacy disclosures poses compliance risks under GDPR and similar regulations. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be significantly enhanced by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and improving privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen site security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security-related inquiries.
  4. Clarify domain registration details or use verified WHOIS data to enhance legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Establish and disclose an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure program to demonstrate security maturity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PULSE CLINIC
Description
PULSE CLINIC provides sexual healthcare services including PrEP for HIV prevention, STD/STI testing and treatment, and other health check-ups. It is a licensed private clinic in Asia with 20 branches in 5 countries and serves a global clientele.
Key services
PrEP for HIV prevention, STD/STI testing and treatment, PCR Multiplex DNA testing, Bodybuilder health check-ups, Teleconsultation and telemedicine, Medical certificates and documentation, Emergency PEP, IV Drip Bar and immune boosters
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Next.js), Font Awesome 6, Google Fonts, Slick Carousel, SweetAlert2, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies (implied by HTTPS)
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found or linked.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  5. Presence of tracking pixels and analytics scripts without clear privacy disclosures.
  6. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible privacy protection or domain registration issues.
  7. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  9. Business appears focused on sexual healthcare services in Asia, primarily Thailand.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React-based framework (Next.js) with integration of popular libraries such as Font Awesome and Slick Carousel for UI components. It uses Google Fonts for typography and includes analytics via Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. The site is mobile responsive and well-structured for SEO with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed by optimizing third-party scripts. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved to meet higher standards. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless approach. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional user experience but has room for optimization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pulse-clinic.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pulse-clinic.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.