Skip to main content

Security report for puls2.pl

Telewizja Puls Sp. z o.o. · Media · Poland

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Puls 2 is a Polish television channel operated by Telewizja Puls Sp. z o.o., offering a broad range of entertainment including series, films, and cultural programming targeted at a general Polish audience. The website reflects a mature digital presence with modern web technologies such as React and Next.js, providing a responsive and user-friendly experience. The site integrates social media channels extensively, enhancing audience engagement and brand visibility. From a security perspective, the site employs HTTPS and DNSSEC, indicating a good baseline security posture, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly available. Privacy and cookie policies are present and appear GDPR compliant, with consent mechanisms implemented. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-maintained, supporting the brand's market position as a reputable media outlet in Poland.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching puls2.pl

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention puls2.pl, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for puls2.pl right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Telewizja Puls operates Puls 2 as part of its media portfolio, targeting Polish viewers with diverse programming. The business model relies on broadcast advertising and sponsorships, supported by a strong online presence and social media integration. The company maintains partnerships with related domains such as tvpuls.pl and pulskids.pl, expanding its reach across different audience segments. The domain's long registration history and consistent branding reinforce its market credibility. The content strategy focuses on popular TV series and films, with active promotion of new seasons and special programming. The company appears to be medium-sized with a stable market position in the Polish media landscape.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforced and DNSSEC enabled, reducing risks of interception and DNS spoofing. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Tracking technologies are used responsibly with privacy policies in place. The security posture is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional security best practices and formalizing incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users, including those with disabilities.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking pixels to ensure compliance with privacy regulations and minimize security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Telewizja Puls Sp. z o.o.
Description
Puls 2 is a Polish television channel offering a variety of TV programs including series, films, and entertainment content. It is part of Telewizja Puls group and targets Polish-speaking audiences with a focus on entertainment and cultural programming.
Key services
TV broadcasting, Program scheduling, Online program information, Social media engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, JavaScript, CSS, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • DNSSEC enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Analytics, TikTok Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
TikTok Pixel, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional TV channel site with rich multimedia content.
  2. Strong social media integration and active presence.
  3. Uses modern web technologies and frameworks.
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  5. Good privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt present.
  8. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-term operation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks, primarily Next.js and React, enabling server-side rendering and improved performance. The use of Swiper.js enhances interactive content presentation. The site is hosted likely via OVH SAS, a reputable provider, with domain registration also through OVH. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices evident through meta tags and structured content. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. The technical stack is current and supports a scalable, maintainable web presence, though opportunities exist to optimize loading times and enhance security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with puls2.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review puls2.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.