Skip to main content

Security report for pullandbear.com

Pull & Bear · Retail · Finland

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pull & Bear is a well-established international fashion retail brand specializing in casual clothing, shoes, and accessories for men and women. The website targets the Finnish market with localized content and is part of the Inditex group, a major player in global retail. The site offers a modern e-commerce experience with frequent new arrivals and seasonal collections. Technically, the website employs a proprietary Inditex ecommerce framework, uses Akamai CDN for content delivery, and integrates Google Tag Manager and OneTrust for analytics and privacy compliance. The site is mobile-optimized and performs well with good SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, security headers present, and script protection via Jscrambler. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published, and WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly impacts trust assessment. Overall, the site is professional, secure, and compliant with GDPR, serving a broad general audience with safe content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pullandbear.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
80
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pullandbear.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
112,678
Employees
0
Customers
112,631
Third parties
47
Weak passwords
5%

32 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for pullandbear.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pull & Bear operates in the competitive fashion retail sector, leveraging the global reach and resources of its parent company Inditex. The business model focuses on fast fashion with frequent product updates and a strong online presence. The Finnish localized site indicates a targeted approach to regional markets. The company benefits from brand recognition, consistent branding, and a comprehensive digital marketing ecosystem including cookie consent and analytics tools. Revenue streams are primarily from online sales of apparel and accessories. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the site suggests reliance on contact forms and centralized customer service. The partnership ecosystem includes major CDN and privacy vendors, supporting a robust e-commerce infrastructure.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, modern security headers, and use of Jscrambler to protect JavaScript assets. Cookie consent is managed via OneTrust, indicating GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. However, the lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents a gap in transparency and readiness. The missing WHOIS data limits domain registration trust analysis but does not indicate immediate risk given the brand's reputation. Recommendations include publishing explicit security and incident response policies, adding a security.txt file, and enhancing user account security measures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Enhance transparency by providing data protection officer contact details to strengthen GDPR compliance.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider implementing multi-factor authentication for user accounts to improve security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pull & Bear
Description
At Pull&Bear, we have the most casual fashion for Spring/Summer 2025. New arrivals every week in women's and men's clothing, shoes and accessories.
Key services
Online retail of clothing, shoes, and accessories
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Akamai CDN, Jscrambler, Google Maps API
Frameworks
Inditex proprietary ecommerce framework
Platforms
Web desktop, Web mobile
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with OneTrust
  • Input validation on forms
  • Use of Jscrambler for script protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (implied)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent, Jscrambler, Google Analytics (implied)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Professional e-commerce site for a major international fashion brand
  3. Strong privacy and cookie compliance with OneTrust integration
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML content
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain registration trust analysis
  6. Use of modern web technologies and CDN for performance
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a proprietary Inditex ecommerce framework with modern JavaScript and CSS assets. It leverages Akamai CDN for fast content delivery and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile responsive with good accessibility and SEO optimization. Performance is fast with optimized assets and caching. The use of Jscrambler indicates attention to protecting client-side code. There is no evidence of technical debt or deprecated technologies. Opportunities exist to improve transparency around security and incident response. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a robust and scalable e-commerce platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pullandbear.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pullandbear.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.