Skip to main content

Security report for public-sex-porn.com

Public Sex Porn · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Public-sex-porn.com is a niche adult entertainment website specializing in free public sex videos. The site offers a variety of video content categorized by themes such as outdoor, dogging, and public nudity, targeting adult audiences interested in this genre. The business model relies primarily on advertising revenue, with affiliate partnerships evident. The website is built on WordPress with common plugins for SEO and performance optimization, hosted via a registrar-associated DNS provider. Technically, the site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use, with good SEO practices but basic accessibility features. Security posture is average; HTTPS is enforced, but security headers and advanced protections are lacking. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no cookie consent mechanism despite tracking scripts. Contact information is limited to a contact form, with no direct emails or phone numbers provided. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the site's profile, showing a domain age appropriate for the business. Overall, the site is functional and serves its niche but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching public-sex-porn.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche segment within the adult media industry, focusing on public sex content. Its competitive advantage lies in curated content and affiliate marketing partnerships. Revenue streams are primarily advertising-based, supplemented by affiliate referrals. The target customer segment is adult users seeking free public sex videos. The site maintains a network of related adult content sites, enhancing cross-promotion opportunities. Growth indicators include active content updates and SEO optimization. The partnership ecosystem includes affiliate domains such as kurcag.com and pornguide.blog. Strategic observations suggest potential for monetization improvement through enhanced privacy compliance and direct user engagement.

Security posture

The site's security maturity is moderate. HTTPS is correctly implemented, ensuring encrypted data transmission. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options exposes the site to certain risks. Forms lack visible advanced protections such as CAPTCHA, increasing susceptibility to automated abuse. Privacy compliance gaps exist, notably the lack of cookie consent despite tracking technologies. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident. No critical vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected. The security culture appears basic, with room for improvement in policy transparency and technical safeguards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and inform users about tracking.
  4. Enhance form security by integrating CAPTCHA or anti-bot measures to prevent abuse.
  5. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact to improve security transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Public Sex Porn
Description
Watch free sex in public videos, enjoy the danger of being caught, airplane toilet porn, POV public blowjob, beach quickie, bus groping, and dogging.
Key services
Free streaming of public sex videos, Guides to public porn sites, Affiliate links to related adult content
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, WP Rocket, Yoast SEO, Font Awesome
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Revive Adserver
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a niche adult content platform focused on public sex videos.
  2. Content is accessible and well-structured with multiple video listings and categories.
  3. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; only contact form available.
  4. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite use of tracking and ads.
  5. Security headers and advanced security policies are lacking.
  6. Advertising is primarily via Revive Adserver with Google Analytics tracking.
  7. WHOIS data is transparent and domain is not privacy protected.
  8. Site uses WordPress CMS with common plugins like Yoast SEO and WP Rocket.
  9. No evidence of malware or phishing detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, leveraging plugins such as Yoast SEO for search optimization and WP Rocket for caching and performance. The tech stack includes jQuery and Font Awesome for UI elements. Hosting is via a registrar-associated DNS provider with no advanced CDN detected. Performance is moderate, with lazy loading and prefetching techniques employed. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design and viewport settings. Accessibility is basic, with some ARIA and semantic HTML elements but no advanced features. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which could impact resilience against attacks. Modernization opportunities include adopting stronger security practices and enhancing privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with public-sex-porn.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review public-sex-porn.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.