Skip to main content

Security report for psg.fr

Paris Saint-Germain · Media · France

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Paris Saint-Germain's official website serves as a comprehensive digital platform for fans and stakeholders to access the latest news, live match updates, and exclusive content related to the club's various sports activities including men's and women's football, handball, judo, and esports. The site is professionally designed with consistent branding and targets a global audience of sports enthusiasts and PSG supporters. Technically, the website leverages modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, though it lacks explicit security policies and incident response information. Overall, the website demonstrates a mature digital presence with room for improvement in transparency and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching psg.fr

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
90
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention psg.fr, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
19,988
Employees
22
Customers
19,846
Third parties
120
Weak passwords
11%

Latest record dated 2026-06-13 · 62 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for psg.fr.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –sts.psg.fr2026-06-13
  • –sts.psg.fr2026-06-13
  • –sts.psg.fr2026-06-13
  • –ams.psg.fr2026-06-07
  • –sts.psg.fr2026-05-21

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PSG operates as a leading sports club with a strong media and entertainment focus. The website reflects a business model centered on fan engagement, content distribution, and brand promotion. The absence of detailed WHOIS data suggests privacy protection measures typical for high-profile entities. The site integrates marketing and analytics tools like Google Tag Manager, indicating active audience measurement and campaign effectiveness tracking. The target market includes football fans worldwide, with content tailored to various sports disciplines under the PSG brand. The professional presentation and extensive content offerings position PSG as a dominant player in the sports media sector.

Security posture

The website maintains a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism that aligns with GDPR requirements. However, the lack of visible security headers, published security policies, or incident response contacts limits transparency and may hinder trust from security-conscious users. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site would benefit from implementing additional security headers, publishing a security policy, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure program to enhance its security maturity and compliance posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the homepage.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and designate a data protection officer publicly.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and publish a security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance cookie consent transparency by detailing data retention policies and partner information more explicitly.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Paris Saint-Germain
Description
Dive into the heart of Paris Saint-Germain: follow the latest news and live matches, discover exclusive content, and feel the excitement with PSG players.
Key services
Latest news and live match updates, Exclusive content about players and club, Information on men's, women's, youth football, handball, judo, esports
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Next.js), JavaScript, CSS, Google Tag Manager, Privacy Center SDK
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No WHOIS data available from AFNIC server for .fr domain, indicating privacy protection or non-disclosure.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed explanations.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service links found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks (Next.js, React).
  7. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  9. Content is focused on sports news and club information, safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Next.js, a React-based framework, which supports server-side rendering and optimized performance. The use of multiple preloaded fonts and images indicates attention to performance and user experience. Integration with Google Tag Manager and a privacy center SDK shows a focus on analytics and compliance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless CMS approach. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-implemented, supporting a high-quality user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with psg.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review psg.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.