Skip to main content

Security report for prysmiangroup.com

Prysmian · Energy · N/a

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

88/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Prysmian is a global leader in the cable manufacturing industry, specializing in energy solutions and telecommunications cables and systems. The company positions itself as a world leader, targeting industrial and commercial clients requiring advanced cable and energy infrastructure. The website reflects a mature enterprise with a comprehensive digital presence, leveraging Drupal 10 CMS and multiple modern web technologies to deliver a professional and accessible user experience. The site includes robust privacy and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating a strong commitment to GDPR compliance and user data protection. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises questions about domain registration transparency, although the corporate branding and content strongly support legitimacy. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and consent management, but lacks visible HTTP security headers and explicit security policies. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and compliant, with room for improvement in domain registration transparency and security header implementation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing X-XSS-Protection header

      Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

      What to do: Add "X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block"

    • Medium

      Missing Permissions-Policy header

      Controls browser features and APIs

      What to do: Implement a Permissions-Policy to restrict feature access

      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Permissions-Policy: accelerometer=(), autoplay=(), camera=(), cross-origin-isolated=(),…

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Medium

      SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

      SSL certificate expires in 78 days

      What to do: Plan SSL certificate renewal

    • Medium

      Mixed Content Detected

      19 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

      What to do: Ensure all resources (images, scripts, stylesheets) are loaded over HTTPS

Keep watching prysmiangroup.com

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
88

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Prysmian operates in the energy and telecommunications sectors, providing cable manufacturing and related solutions. Its business model focuses on manufacturing and supplying cables and systems to industrial clients worldwide. The company benefits from a strong market position as a world leader, supported by a comprehensive website that targets business customers. The digital infrastructure supports extensive analytics and marketing tools, indicating active engagement in digital marketing and customer insights. The lack of direct contact information on the main page suggests a focus on corporate clients who may access contact details through dedicated channels. The company’s partnership ecosystem includes major platforms like Google, Facebook, LinkedIn, and Vimeo, enhancing its digital reach and marketing capabilities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with enforced HTTPS and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot. However, the absence of explicit HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a notable gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency in security governance. The WHOIS data unavailability is a concern for domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a corporate website but could be enhanced by implementing recommended security headers and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and libraries to ensure they are up to date and secure.
  5. Investigate and resolve the WHOIS data unavailability to improve domain registration transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Prysmian
Description
Welcome to Prysmian: the world leader in cable manufacturer, energy solutions, telecom cables and systems industry.
Key services
cable manufacturing, energy solutions, telecom cables and systems
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, jQuery, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Font Awesome, Slick Carousel, Select2, SimpleBar, Scrolling Tabs
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL https)
  • Cookie consent management implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Sharethis
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and structured data
  2. Strong cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms in place
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet
  4. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain registration trust analysis
  5. Use of modern CMS (Drupal 10) and multiple third-party libraries
  6. Good SEO and social media integration
  7. No security.txt or explicit security policy pages detected
  8. No visible security headers in provided data; recommend audit
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10 CMS, utilizing a modern technology stack including jQuery, Cookiebot for consent management, Google Tag Manager, and various UI libraries such as Slick Carousel and Select2. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. SEO is well addressed through meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. The technical infrastructure supports extensive analytics and marketing integrations, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. However, the lack of visible security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks that should be addressed to enhance overall security and trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 88/100 +20Low20 findingsView report
  2. 68/100Medium24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with prysmiangroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review prysmiangroup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.