Skip to main content

Security report for protetickypacient.cz

Asociace protetických pacientů z.s. · Healthcare · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Asociace protetických pacientů z.s. is a Czech non-profit organization dedicated to advocating for and supporting prosthetic and orthopedic patients and other health-disabled individuals. The website serves as an informational and community platform, providing detailed guidance on the prosthetic fitting process and listing partners and patrons. The organization positions itself as a patient advocacy group with a focus on healthcare support and public benefit activities. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with standard plugins including GiveWP for donations, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is accessible, mobile-optimized, and provides clear navigation, but lacks comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage and nonce tokens in forms but lacks visible security headers and incident response information. WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces domain trustworthiness but may be due to privacy protection common in Czech domains. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy for its purpose but would benefit from enhanced compliance and security measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching protetickypacient.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention protetickypacient.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for protetickypacient.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the healthcare and non-profit sectors, targeting prosthetic and orthopedic patients in the Czech Republic. Its business model revolves around advocacy, support, and fundraising through donations. The website content and partner listings suggest a well-established network within the prosthetic care community. The absence of detailed company registration or VAT information limits full business transparency. The site’s use of WordPress and donation plugins indicates a focus on community engagement and fundraising. Growth indicators include recent posts and active content updates. Strategic partnerships with prosthetic care providers and sponsors are evident, enhancing credibility and outreach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and nonce tokens are used in donation forms to prevent CSRF attacks. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The lack of explicit privacy, cookie, and incident response policies indicates compliance gaps, especially under GDPR and NIS2 frameworks. The site would benefit from a formal security policy and incident response contact channels to improve readiness and trust. Regular updates and security audits are recommended to maintain and enhance security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add and configure security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish clear incident response and security contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate potential risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Asociace protetických pacientů z.s.
Description
Spolek je dobrovolným, nevládním, neziskovým, nepolitickým sdružením občanů, v němž se sdružili protetičtí a ortopedičtí pacienti, handicapovaní a jinak zdravotně postižení k aktivní činnosti na jejich ochranu a jejich podporu, k popularizaci tohoto cíle a k poskytování obecně prospěšné činnosti v oblasti poskytování zdravotní péče a služeb zdravotně postiženým.
Key services
advocacy for health-disabled persons, support and protection of patient interests, information dissemination about prosthetic care, providing general beneficial activities in healthcare
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, PHP (implied), GiveWP donation plugin, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Fonts (Inter), React (for some admin or plugin scripts)
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by URLs
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of nonce tokens in donation forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Czech non-profit patient advocacy group for prosthetic and orthopedic patients.
  2. Content is in Czech language and well-structured with detailed information about prosthetic care.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on main page.
  5. Donation functionality present via GiveWP plugin, indicating fundraising activity.
  6. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected in HTML content.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust assessment.
  8. No signs of adult or inappropriate content.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3, utilizing the GiveWP plugin for donation management, jQuery 3.7.1, and Google Fonts for typography. React libraries are loaded, likely for admin or plugin interfaces. The site uses a classic WordPress theme (twentytwelve) with custom styling. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators. Mobile responsiveness is good, and accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA attributes are present. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags and canonical links but lacks advanced structured data or Open Graph metadata. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack and improve performance and SEO through enhanced metadata and caching strategies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with protetickypacient.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review protetickypacient.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.