Skip to main content

Security report for prosuco.nl

Prosuco · Hospitality · Netherlands

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Prosuco is a specialized marketing agency focused on the recreation sector, particularly campings and holiday parks in the Netherlands. The company offers a comprehensive suite of marketing services including website development, brand strategy, online marketing, booking system support, and print materials. With a portfolio of over 150 clients, Prosuco holds a strong market position as a trusted partner in its niche. Technically, the website employs a variety of modern analytics and marketing tools, supported by a cookie consent mechanism that aligns with GDPR requirements. The site is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear contact information, enhancing user trust and engagement. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and enforces cookie consent but lacks explicit security policies and some security headers, and uses an outdated jQuery version which could pose minor risks. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and compliant, with room for improvement in security transparency and technical updates.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching prosuco.nl

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
45
Email security
65
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Prosuco operates as a small-sized, essential entity within the hospitality sector, targeting campings and holiday parks. Its business model revolves around providing tailored marketing solutions to increase direct bookings and visibility for recreation businesses. The company leverages partnerships with booking system providers and integrates multiple marketing and analytics platforms to deliver value. The extensive client portfolio and visible success stories indicate strong market acceptance and growth potential. The company maintains active social media channels and a professional online presence, supporting its competitive advantage. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, suggesting an independent operation focused on its niche market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism that supports GDPR compliance. Multiple tracking and analytics tools are integrated responsibly with user consent. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and security.txt files indicates gaps in transparency and readiness. The use of an outdated jQuery version is a minor vulnerability that should be addressed to mitigate risks. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Security headers appear to be missing or not visible in the HTML content, which is a recommended enhancement. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with better documentation and technical updates.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and incident response procedures.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Upgrade jQuery and other third-party libraries to their latest secure versions to reduce vulnerability exposure.
  4. Consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  5. Regularly audit and monitor third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure ongoing privacy compliance and security.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Prosuco
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Prosuco
Description
Prosuco is a marketing expert specialized in the recreation sector, focusing on marketing for campings and holiday parks to increase bookings and visibility.
Key services
Websites, Brand story & strategy, Online marketing (SEA, SEO, social media, email marketing, automation), Booking system support (Tommy Booking Support integration), Print materials (brochures, flyers, direct mails)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.12.4, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics 4, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Matomo Analytics, TikTok Pixel, Leadinfo, Hotjar, Vimeo (video embedding)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular consent options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern tracking and analytics scripts with consent

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics 4, Matomo, Microsoft Clarity, Leadinfo, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads, TikTok Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, Google Analytics 4, Matomo, Microsoft Clarity, Leadinfo, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, Matomo, Microsoft Clarity, Leadinfo, Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms.
  2. Strong focus on marketing services for the recreation sector in the Netherlands.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with granular user control.
  4. Multiple analytics and tracking tools integrated with consent.
  5. Contact information is clearly presented and consistent across the site.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  8. Use of somewhat outdated jQuery version may pose minor security risk.
  9. No suspicious or malicious domains linked.
  10. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a mix of legacy and modern technologies, including jQuery 1.12.4, Google Tag Manager, GA4, Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, Matomo, Microsoft Clarity, Leadinfo, and Hotjar. The site is well-structured with proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and JSON-LD structured data for SEO and rich snippets. Performance is moderate with lazy loading images and responsive design for mobile devices. Accessibility is basic but functional. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The site uses Vimeo for video embedding and multiple external domains for fonts and analytics. There is an opportunity to modernize the tech stack by updating legacy libraries and enhancing security headers. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with prosuco.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review prosuco.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.