Skip to main content

Security report for prosess21.no

Energy · Norway

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.prosess21.no serves as an informational and strategic platform focused on the industrial strategy for the process industry in Norway. It appears to be a government or research-backed initiative aimed at industry professionals, researchers, and policymakers. The site provides detailed information about industrial strategies and related initiatives, linking to several partner domains within the Norwegian industrial and energy sectors. Technically, the website is hosted on Microsoft Azure and uses modern analytics tools such as Piwik PRO and Microsoft Application Insights, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The presence of a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy demonstrates good privacy compliance and user data protection awareness. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses reputable cloud services, though explicit security headers are not fully confirmed. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, no direct contact information or security incident response details are provided, which could be improved for transparency and user trust. Overall, the website is professional, well-structured, and trustworthy, with a moderate to good security posture and compliance level.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching prosess21.no

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
80
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site positions itself within the Norwegian energy and process industry sectors, collaborating with related initiatives such as Maritim21, Energi21, Transport21, and OG21. This network suggests a strategic ecosystem focused on advancing industrial innovation and research. The business model is informational and strategic, likely funded by government or research grants rather than commercial revenue. The target audience includes industry stakeholders and policymakers. The website's content quality and branding are consistent, supporting its role as a credible information source. The lack of direct contact details or commercial services indicates a focus on public sector or research communication rather than direct business transactions.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation by enforcing HTTPS and integrating with Microsoft Azure's secure hosting environment. The use of Piwik PRO for analytics suggests attention to privacy and data protection. The cookie consent banner is detailed and GDPR-compliant, enhancing user trust. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options could be a minor gap. No forms or input fields are present, reducing attack surface. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, which is a potential area for improvement. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from enhanced transparency and additional security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish clear contact information including security incident response contacts to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are used.
  5. Enhance website SEO and accessibility by ensuring all meta tags and ARIA attributes are fully optimized.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website for a Norwegian industrial strategy initiative focused on the process industry, likely government or research funded, providing information and resources related to industrial strategy.
Key services
Information dissemination, Strategic guidance, Research collaboration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Microsoft Azure, Piwik PRO, CookieInformation Consent Management, Azure Application Insights, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with detailed cookie info
  • Use of Microsoft Azure security features

Analytics and tracking

Services
Piwik PRO, Microsoft Application Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Piwik PRO, Microsoft Application Insights
Marketing tools
CookieInformation Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent banner with detailed cookie information and links to privacy policies.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on the homepage content.
  4. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  5. Use of Microsoft Azure and Piwik PRO indicates a modern and privacy-aware technical infrastructure.
  6. Multiple related domains from Norwegian industrial and research initiatives are linked, indicating a network of related projects.
  7. No explicit security policy, incident response, or vulnerability disclosure information found on the site.
  8. No social media links or explicit business contact information found in the analyzed content.
  9. Website content is in Norwegian and targeted at Norwegian industry stakeholders.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages Microsoft Azure for hosting and cloud services, indicating a robust and scalable infrastructure. It uses Piwik PRO and Microsoft Application Insights for analytics and monitoring, reflecting a modern approach to data collection and performance tracking. The site is built with standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, with no detected CMS. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented via CookieInformation, a recognized consent management platform. No broken elements or errors were detected in the analyzed content. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and add structured data for enhanced SEO.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with prosess21.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review prosess21.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.