Skip to main content

Security report for prosegur.com.au

Armaguard · Finance · Australia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Armaguard Australia, part of the Linfox Armaguard Group, is a leading provider of secure currency supply chain and technology solutions across Australia, New Zealand, and Southeast Asia. Established in 1938, the company serves major banks, financial institutions, ATM networks, and retailers with services including currency management, secure transport, and precious cargo protection. The website reflects a mature business with a strong market position and a broad service portfolio. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like Bootstrap and uses essential plugins such as Yoast SEO and Contact Form 7. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices, though performance is moderate. Security measures include HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA on forms, but the absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates room for improvement. From a security perspective, the site shows a solid baseline with encrypted connections and form protections but lacks published security policies and incident response contacts. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and business-focused, with recommendations to enhance security headers, DNS security, and privacy compliance to further strengthen its posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching prosegur.com.au

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Armaguard operates in the finance and transportation sectors, specializing in currency management and secure logistics. Its competitive advantage lies in its long-standing market presence since 1938, integration with the Linfox Group, and partnerships with major financial entities. The business model focuses on B2B services, offering secure transport and technology solutions. The company targets banks, retailers, and financial institutions, leveraging subsidiaries and partners to expand its service offerings. Growth indicators include a comprehensive digital presence and multiple business divisions. Strategic observations highlight the importance of maintaining security and compliance to uphold trust in a sensitive industry.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and Google reCAPTCHA protects contact forms, reducing spam and automated abuse. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents potential vulnerabilities. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response contact, which could hinder timely response to security incidents. Data protection practices appear sound with no exposed sensitive information. Compliance with GDPR and other regulations is partial, with no cookie consent mechanism detected. The security culture could be improved by publishing clear policies and enhancing technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a detailed security policy and provide incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with privacy regulations such as GDPR.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Linfox Armaguard Pty Ltd
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Armaguard
Description
Linofox Armaguard Group is a leader in secure currency supply chain and technology solutions across Australia, New Zealand and Southeast Asia.
Key services
Currency management, Secure transport, Precious cargo protection, Technology and integrated currency management solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, jQuery 3.7.1, Bootstrap 5.3.3, Yoast SEO plugin, Contact Form 7, Google reCAPTCHA v2
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is business-focused with clear service offerings.
  3. Contact information is prominently displayed with multiple channels.
  4. No privacy or cookie consent banners detected, which may affect compliance.
  5. Security practices are good but could be improved with additional headers and DNSSEC.
  6. No evidence of advertising or tracking beyond essential scripts.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for scripting. SEO is enhanced via the Yoast plugin, and contact forms are managed with Contact Form 7 integrated with Google reCAPTCHA v2 for spam protection. The site loads fonts from Google Fonts and uses SVG and WOFF font formats for performance. Hosting details are not explicit, but the site is served over HTTPS with valid SSL. Performance is moderate, with some opportunities for optimization. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and semantic markup. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional business website but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with prosegur.com.au. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review prosegur.com.au.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.