Skip to main content

Security report for proposales.com

Proposales AB · Hospitality · Sweden

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Proposales AB operates a modern SaaS platform focused on proposal creation, e-signature, and sales process optimization for the hospitality industry, particularly hotels and MICE groups. The company positions itself as a leading solution with strong integration capabilities to PMS, S&C, and CRM systems, serving hundreds of hotel brands worldwide. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and extensive customer testimonials, reinforcing its market position. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, GSAP for animations, Hubspot for forms and analytics, Intercom for customer engagement, and Cookiebot for privacy compliance. The site is hosted behind Cloudflare, ensuring performance and security. The technical implementation is robust, with good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, implements key security headers, and uses secure form submission methods. However, it lacks a dedicated security policy or incident response information, which could be improved to enhance transparency and trust. The privacy compliance is strong, with a comprehensive privacy policy, cookie consent mechanism, and GDPR adherence. Overall, the website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, security, and compliance, supporting a strong business credibility score. Recommendations include publishing explicit security and incident response policies, and maintaining vigilance on third-party script security to sustain trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
63/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching proposales.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
63
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Proposales AB is well-positioned in the hospitality sector, offering a niche SaaS product that streamlines proposal and contract management for hotels and event groups. Its competitive advantage lies in seamless integrations with major PMS and CRM platforms, enhancing workflow efficiency. The business model is subscription-based, targeting medium-sized to large hotel groups and MICE professionals. The presence of multiple industry awards and extensive customer testimonials indicates strong market acceptance and growth potential. The company maintains a consistent brand image and leverages a partner ecosystem including Hubspot, Intercom, and Cookiebot to support marketing and customer engagement. The website content and structure reflect a focus on user experience and conversion optimization.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and secure data handling via Hubspot forms. The use of Cookiebot ensures compliance with cookie regulations and user consent management. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a public security policy or incident response contact limits transparency. The integration of multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing security reviews to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the site aligns well with best practices but could enhance its security culture by publishing explicit policies and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to prevent supply chain vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Proposales AB
Description
Proposales™ is a modern proposal and e-signature tool designed for hotels and hospitality groups, enabling creation, sending, and e-signing of proposals with integrations to PMS, S&C, and CRM systems.
Key services
Interactive web proposals, E-signature and payments, 2-way connectivity with PMS, S&C, CRM, Insights and analytics on proposals
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, jQuery, GSAP, Split-Type, Anime.js, Hubspot forms, Intercom, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Adroll, Albacross, Cloudflare
Frameworks
Webflow, GSAP
Platforms
Hubspot, Intercom
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • Secure form submissions via Hubspot API
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hubspot Analytics, LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Pixel, Albacross
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Adroll, Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Hubspot, Albacross, LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Hubspot, Intercom, Cookiebot, Adroll, Albacross
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented via Cookiebot.
  3. Multiple customer testimonials with high ratings enhance trust.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and integrations with major platforms.
  5. Strong focus on hospitality industry with clear business positioning.
  6. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML; contact via forms.
  7. Security headers and HTTPS are properly configured.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  9. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools with transparent privacy links.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as GSAP for animations and Anime.js for logo effects. It integrates with Hubspot for marketing automation and analytics, Intercom for customer support, and Cookiebot for privacy compliance. Hosting is managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The site demonstrates fast loading times, responsive design, and good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. The technical implementation is clean with no visible errors or broken elements. Opportunities exist to further optimize accessibility and to document security and compliance frameworks explicitly.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with proposales.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review proposales.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.