Skip to main content

Security report for propine.com

Propine · Finance · Singapore

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Propine is a Singapore-based enterprise-grade digital asset custodian specializing in custody, tokenization, trading, and DeFi solutions for institutional clients. The company holds a Capital Markets Services (CMS) license from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), positioning it as a trusted and regulated player in the digital asset custody market in Asia. Their platform targets banks, family offices, asset managers, corporates, exchanges, and protocol foundations, offering services such as Digital Custody ProTect™, Tokenization DASH™, and white label custody solutions. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and a focus on institutional clientele. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and several modern plugins like Yoast SEO and WP Rocket, hosted on AWS infrastructure. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, SEO practices, and moderate performance. However, there is room for improvement in accessibility and security headers. The domain is mature, registered since 2001, and shows consistency with the business claims, enhancing trustworthiness. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections, but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security policies or incident response information. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. Contact information is primarily via forms, with no direct emails or phone numbers publicly listed. Overall, Propine presents as a credible and professional digital asset custody provider with a strong market position in Asia. Enhancing privacy compliance, security transparency, and adding direct contact channels would further strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching propine.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Propine operates in the regulated digital asset custody sector, focusing on institutional clients in finance. Their CMS license from MAS and partnerships with licensed payment service providers indicate a strong compliance framework. The business model revolves around providing custody, tokenization, and DeFi infrastructure as a service, including white label solutions to expand client reach. The company targets a diverse institutional audience, including banks, asset managers, corporates, and exchanges, indicating a broad market approach. The mature domain age and professional website suggest established operations. The lack of direct contact details and limited public privacy/security policies may reflect a controlled client onboarding process typical in regulated financial services. The company leverages modern web technologies and SEO tools to maintain digital presence but could improve transparency and user engagement through enhanced policies and contact options.

Security posture

Propine demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections in place. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents areas for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the website content. The lack of published security policies or incident response procedures limits transparency and may impact client confidence. Forms appear secure but no explicit security measures or certifications beyond CMS licensing are publicly stated. Overall, the security posture aligns with a regulated financial service provider but would benefit from enhanced security documentation, header implementation, and incident response readiness to meet higher compliance standards such as GDPR or NIS2.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to enhance GDPR compliance.
  3. Add standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) to strengthen web security posture.
  4. Publish explicit security policies and incident response procedures to improve transparency and client trust.
  5. Provide direct contact information such as company emails and phone numbers for better client engagement and support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Propine
Description
Enterprise-grade custody, tokenization, trading & DeFi solutions for digital assets and Fiat.
Key services
Digital asset custody (Digital Custody ProTect™), Asset tokenization (Tokenization DASH™), Trading and DeFi solutions, White label custody platform services, Ramp on/off between digital assets and fiat
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, WP Rocket, jQuery, Elementskit, Font Awesome
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • Use of CMS license and regulatory compliance claims

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear business focus on institutional digital asset custody
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on main page or linked menus
  3. Contact information is primarily via contact forms and demo booking; no direct emails or phone numbers found
  4. No visible security or incident response policies published
  5. Use of modern WordPress plugins and SEO tools indicates moderate digital maturity
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected
  7. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond standard WordPress and plugin scripts
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for page building, Yoast SEO for search optimization, and WP Rocket for performance enhancements. Hosting is via AWS DNS infrastructure, indicating reliable cloud hosting. The site uses standard web technologies including jQuery and Font Awesome icons. Performance is moderate with lazy loading scripts and responsive design for mobile devices. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. No critical technical debt or outdated libraries were detected, but security headers and DNSSEC are missing, representing technical risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence but requires security hardening and privacy compliance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with propine.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review propine.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.