Skip to main content

Security report for prompt-brush.com

Prompt-Brush 1.0 · Media · United States

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Prompt-Brush 1.0 is an artistic project and book by Pablo Delcan that offers a human-centric alternative to AI-generated art by manually interpreting public-submitted prompts into original artwork. The website serves as a promotional platform for pre-orders and showcases the author's credentials and media recognition. Technically, the site is built on Squarespace with standard modern web technologies and includes basic security measures such as HTTPS and reCAPTCHA. However, it lacks privacy and cookie policies, which are important for compliance. The absence of WHOIS data raises some concerns about domain registration transparency, but the professional presentation and credible external links support legitimacy. Overall, the site is well-designed and functional but could improve privacy compliance and security headers.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching prompt-brush.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the media and creative arts sector, targeting artists, educators, and creative professionals interested in the intersection of human creativity and AI art. Its business model centers on book sales and artistic advocacy, leveraging media coverage and social media presence for market positioning. The project is niche but has gained attention from reputable publications, enhancing its credibility. The website's ecosystem includes links to major book retailers and social media platforms, supporting sales and community engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and HSTS enabled, protecting data in transit. The use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms helps mitigate spam and automated abuse. However, the site lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of incident response or vulnerability disclosure information suggests limited transparency in security management.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance web security.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents or vulnerability disclosures to improve trust and transparency.
  4. Verify and publish WHOIS domain registration data or use a reputable privacy protection service with transparency to reduce suspicion.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search engine visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Prompt-Brush 1.0
Description
Prompt-Brush 1.0 is a project and book by graphic designer and art director Pablo Delcan, presenting a human-centered approach to generative art by manually interpreting public-submitted text prompts into original artwork. The book contrasts AI-generated art by emphasizing human creativity and sensibility, featuring a curated collection of hand-drawn illustrations.
Key services
Artistic book publication, Creative interpretation of public prompts, Artistic advocacy
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace, JavaScript, Chart.js, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Squarespace CMS
Platforms
Squarespace Hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • HSTS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Squarespace hosted artistic project promoting a book.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact form collects email and prompt text with reCAPTCHA protection.
  4. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly listed.
  5. External links to major book retailers and social media are present.
  6. No security incident or vulnerability disclosure information available.
  7. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible privacy protection or new registration.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Squarespace platform, utilizing JavaScript libraries such as Chart.js and Google reCAPTCHA for interactive and security features. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and moderate performance. The technical implementation is standard for a Squarespace site, with no custom CMS or complex backend detected. Opportunities exist to improve SEO, accessibility, and security header implementation. Hosting is managed by Squarespace, providing reliable uptime and SSL certificates. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but basic.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with prompt-brush.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review prompt-brush.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.