Skip to main content

Security report for promisedland-artfestival.com

Promised Land Art Festival · Media · Poland

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Promised Land Art Festival is a professionally organized event celebrating digital and traditional art, primarily targeting creative professionals in gaming, film, and advertising industries. The festival is supported and organized by CD PROJEKT RED and local cultural institutions in Łódź, Poland, positioning it as a significant niche event in the creative media sector. The website reflects a high level of digital maturity, utilizing modern web technologies such as Next.js and React, with good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and use of reCAPTCHA, though improvements in security headers and explicit security policies are recommended. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, including GDPR considerations. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional image, though the lack of WHOIS data for the domain introduces some uncertainty about domain registration status.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching promisedland-artfestival.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
45
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The festival operates as an event organizer within the media sector, leveraging partnerships with industry leaders and local government bodies. Its business model focuses on event sponsorship, workshops, and networking sessions, targeting professionals and enthusiasts in creative industries. The presence of high-profile sponsors and speakers enhances its market position and credibility. The website's content and structure support effective communication with its audience, facilitating engagement through newsletters and social media. Growth potential is indicated by ongoing sponsorships and expanding event activities. The partnership ecosystem includes CD PROJEKT RED and Łódź cultural institutions, reinforcing its regional and industry relevance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and integration of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from abuse. Cookie consent management via Cookiebot indicates attention to privacy regulations. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options suggests room for enhancement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. Implementing these measures would strengthen the overall security culture and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable components are included.
  5. Enhance monitoring of domain registration status and WHOIS data to ensure domain legitimacy and prevent potential abuse.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Promised Land Art Festival
Description
Promised Land Art Festival is a celebration of digital and traditional art that unites creative industry professionals from gaming, film, and advertising industries worldwide.
Key services
Lectures and discussion panels, Hands-on art workshops, Networking sessions, Industry speaker events
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, JavaScript, CSS Modules, Google reCAPTCHA, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent management

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Strong branding and professional design consistent with a reputable event
  3. Multiple social media channels linked and active
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies present
  5. No signs of WAF or content blocking
  6. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual and warrants monitoring
  7. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks
  8. Security best practices partially implemented but could improve with security headers and explicit security policies
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React/Next.js framework, leveraging CSS Modules for styling and optimized image delivery. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and Cookiebot for cookie consent management, indicating a well-structured approach to performance and privacy. The site loads quickly and is mobile-optimized, providing a good user experience. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site generation approach. Hosting provider details are not explicit but likely use CDN services from CD PROJEKT RED's infrastructure. The technical stack is current and supports scalability and maintainability, though adding accessibility enhancements and security headers would further improve robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with promisedland-artfestival.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review promisedland-artfestival.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.