Skip to main content

Security report for prolife.nl

De christelijke zorgverzekeraar · Healthcare · Netherlands

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

De christelijke zorgverzekeraar is a Dutch health insurance provider that integrates Christian values with general healthcare coverage. It operates as part of the larger Zilveren Kruis group, offering a range of insurance products including basic, supplementary, and dental insurance, as well as specialized Christian care services. The website targets Dutch residents seeking faith-aligned healthcare insurance and provides comprehensive information and customer support. Technically, the site uses Sitecore CMS, jQuery, Vue.js, and Coveo search technology, hosted on Brandshelter infrastructure. However, the security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL/TLS certificate and lack of HTTPS enforcement, which is a critical issue for user trust and data protection. The site employs extensive analytics and marketing tools with good transparency and maintains a professional design and user experience. Strategic improvements in security configuration are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of prolife.nl. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching prolife.nl

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
85
Email security
50
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position as part of Zilveren Kruis, a recognized healthcare group in the Netherlands. Its business model focuses on providing health insurance products with a Christian ethos, appealing to a niche market segment. The website reflects a mature digital presence with multiple service offerings, customer engagement tools, and integration with third-party marketing and analytics platforms. Partnerships with related healthcare entities and a solid social media footprint support its market reach. The absence of explicit business registration or VAT information on the site is noted but not uncommon for consumer-facing insurance providers. Overall, the company demonstrates a stable and credible business operation with growth potential in its specialized market.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low due to the lack of HTTPS and a valid SSL certificate, exposing users to potential risks such as data interception. While security headers like CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection are implemented, the CSP includes unsafe directives that could be tightened. No incident response or security policy pages are found, indicating limited transparency on security governance. The site uses secure cookies with HttpOnly and SameSite attributes, which is positive. Compliance with GDPR is supported by the presence of privacy and cookie policies, but the missing HTTPS undermines overall data protection. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues and enhancement of security policies are critical to reduce business risk and improve user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Install and enforce a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable and configure HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to prevent protocol downgrade attacks.
  3. Review and tighten Content Security Policy to remove unsafe-eval and unsafe-inline directives.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and update third-party libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a robust technical foundation using Sitecore CMS, enhanced with jQuery and Vue.js for frontend interactivity, and Coveo for search functionality. Hosting is managed via Brandshelter with DNS and mail services integrated with Microsoft Outlook protection. Despite a modern tech stack, performance metrics are missing, and the site is flagged as slow, likely due to large images and extensive third-party scripts. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO practices are well implemented with meta tags and structured navigation. Accessibility is basic but present. Technical debt is moderate, with opportunities to improve security and performance through SSL implementation and resource optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 63/100Medium19 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with prolife.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review prolife.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.