Skip to main content

Security report for projektkraft.at

Projekt Kraft · Retail · Austria

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Projekt Kraft is a European general contractor and project management company specializing in retail, hospitality, office, and e-mobility sectors. They provide comprehensive services including planning, design, construction, and facility management with a multilingual team and multiple office locations in Austria, Germany, and Italy. The website is professionally designed with rich content and clear navigation, targeting B2B clients seeking turnkey project solutions. Technically, the site runs on WordPress with modern plugins and tracking tools but suffers from a critical security issue due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate, impacting its security posture significantly. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear cookie and privacy policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the business demonstrates strong credibility and market presence but should urgently address SSL and TLS configuration to improve security and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching projektkraft.at

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
80
Email security
50
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a solid market position as a general contractor with expertise across multiple sectors including retail, gastronomy, hospitality, and e-mobility. Their business model focuses on providing end-to-end project management and construction services across Europe, supported by a multilingual team and local partners. The extensive client portfolio and visible brand partnerships indicate a mature and trusted service provider. The website supports lead generation through contact forms and clear calls to action. Their use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager shows a data-driven approach to marketing and user engagement. However, the absence of explicit security policies and incident response information suggests room for improvement in security governance.

Security posture

The website implements several security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and a Content Security Policy, indicating awareness of web security best practices. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols represent critical vulnerabilities that expose users to risks and undermine trust. The lack of DMARC, DNSSEC, and CAA records further weakens domain security. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are present, limiting transparency and preparedness. Overall, the security posture is basic with significant gaps that require immediate remediation to protect data and maintain compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and install a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and secure user connections.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable legacy insecure protocols.
  3. Implement DNS security enhancements including DMARC, DNSSEC, and CAA records.
  4. Review and tighten Content Security Policy to remove unsafe directives.
  5. Publish clear security and incident response policies to improve transparency and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Salient theme and several plugins including Nectar Slider and WPML for multilingual support. It uses jQuery and Leaflet.js for interactive maps. Hosting appears to be provided by A1.net based on DNS records. SEO is well implemented with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Performance data is unavailable but the site uses modern web fonts and responsive design techniques. Accessibility is basic but present. The site includes Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The main technical risk is the lack of valid SSL and disabled TLS protocols, which impacts security and potentially SEO rankings.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with projektkraft.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review projektkraft.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.