Skip to main content

Security report for projectvoyeur.com

SharpeDezine BV · Media · Netherlands

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Project Voyeur is a well-established adult amateur voyeur community website operated by SharpeDezine BV in the Netherlands. Since 1999, it has provided a platform for sharing voyeuristic amateur photos and videos, offering both free and premium content. The site features community engagement through live chat, forums, and user uploads, targeting adult voyeurs and exhibitionists worldwide. The business model relies on a freemium approach with subscription-based premium content. Technically, the website uses a modern tech stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and various JavaScript libraries to deliver a responsive and user-friendly experience. The site is mobile optimized and includes SEO best practices. However, some accessibility features are basic and could be improved. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses secure forms for login. However, it lacks several important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could expose it to certain web vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is strong, with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies implemented via iubenda, including a consent mechanism. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing trust. Overall, the website presents a moderate risk profile. The main concern is the absence of WHOIS domain registration data, which raises questions about domain legitimacy despite the detailed company information on the site. Enhancing security headers and verifying domain registration would improve trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching projectvoyeur.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Project Voyeur occupies a niche position in the adult media sector, focusing on voyeuristic amateur content. Its competitive advantage lies in its long history, active community, and combination of free and premium offerings. Revenue streams likely include subscriptions and possibly affiliate sales via the adult shop. The target customers are adult voyeurs and exhibitionists seeking authentic amateur content. The company demonstrates a community-driven approach with active moderation and user testimonials, supporting customer retention and growth. Partnerships with related domains such as the adult shop and help resources indicate a broader ecosystem supporting the core business. Strategic observations include the need to address domain registration transparency and enhance security to maintain market trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and login forms use POST methods, which is positive. However, the absence of key security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks such as XSS and clickjacking. No incident response or security policy pages were found, indicating limited formal security governance transparency. Privacy compliance is well addressed through third-party policy management and cookie consent. The lack of WHOIS data is a notable risk factor, potentially indicating privacy protection or registration issues. Overall, the site would benefit from implementing additional security headers, publishing security policies, and verifying domain registration details to improve its security posture and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options HTTP headers to enhance web security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Verify and disclose domain registration details to resolve WHOIS data inconsistencies and enhance trust.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet modern standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Continue maintaining comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SharpeDezine BV
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SharpeDezine BV
Description
Project Voyeur is an adult amateur community focused on voyeuristic amateur porn pictures and videos, active since 1999. It offers free and premium content, live chat, forums, and a community for voyeurs and exhibitionists.
Key services
Free amateur voyeur photos and videos, Premium hardcore amateur content subscription, Live adult chatroom, Community forums, User content uploads
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap CSS, jQuery, Cycle2, NiceScroll, SimplyScroll, Chosen, Typeahead.js, ImagesLoaded, Masonry, CookieConsent, Flowplayer
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure login form with POST method
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and community features.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual for a commercial website.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented via a reputable third-party service (iubenda).
  5. Site uses HTTPS and modern web technologies.
  6. Security headers are minimal and could be improved.
  7. Contact phone number and company address are clearly displayed.
  8. Site targets adult amateur voyeur community with free and premium content.
  9. User testimonials and community engagement are prominent trust signals.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of Bootstrap for responsive design and multiple JavaScript libraries for UI enhancements and media playback. The presence of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager indicates active user behavior tracking. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). However, the lack of a detected CMS suggests a custom or proprietary platform. Performance is moderate with no major issues, but some technical debt may exist due to missing security headers and basic accessibility. Opportunities exist to modernize security configurations and improve accessibility compliance to reduce technical risks impacting business operations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with projectvoyeur.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review projectvoyeur.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.