Skip to main content

Security report for projectneverland.gr

ProjectNeverland · Media · Greece

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ProjectNeverland is a small creative agency based in Athens, Greece, specializing in full-service graphic and web design solutions including branding, hosting, and digital media. The company showcases a professional portfolio with notable clients, emphasizing a balance between strategy and execution to deliver creative results. The website is built on Joomla CMS with modern web technologies and includes a contact form with spam protection. While the site enforces HTTPS and uses Google Analytics for tracking, it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which are important for GDPR compliance. Security headers are not detected, indicating room for improvement in security posture. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy image consistent with a legitimate creative agency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching projectneverland.gr

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ProjectNeverland operates in the media sector, targeting businesses and organizations seeking branding and web design services. The agency's business model focuses on delivering creative solutions through a combination of strategy and execution. The portfolio and client carousel indicate a diverse client base and active engagement in the market. The use of Joomla CMS and integration of Google Analytics suggest a moderate level of digital maturity. Absence of privacy and cookie policies and incident response information highlight compliance gaps. The company maintains privacy protection on domain registration, which is typical for small businesses. No suspicious or fraudulent patterns are detected.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and CSRF tokens implemented in forms. Spam protection is present via a honeypot checkbox. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security effectiveness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The lack of incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates limited preparedness for security incidents. Compliance with GDPR is not clearly demonstrated due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Enhancing security headers and compliance documentation would strengthen the security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Regularly update Joomla CMS and all plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Improve accessibility features to ensure compliance with standards and enhance user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ProjectNeverland
Description
Full-service Graphics & web design agency in Athens. We manufacture a hard copy of your dreams and stories.
Key services
Branding Identity, Graphic Design, Hosting Services, Web Design
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, PHP, MySQL, Joomla CMS, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, Leaflet.js (maps), jQuery (implied by plugins), SEOGenerator
Frameworks
Joomla
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token present in forms
  • Spam protection honeypot checkbox in contact form

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via gtag.js), Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional creative agency site with a portfolio and client showcase.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact form includes spam protection but no explicit security or privacy disclosures.
  4. Uses Joomla CMS with modern frontend technologies and Google Analytics for tracking.
  5. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enforced.
  6. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information available.
  7. WHOIS data is privacy protected but consistent with business type.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Joomla CMS with a combination of HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and PHP technologies. It integrates Google Fonts, Font Awesome icons, and Leaflet.js for interactive maps. The site loads multiple optimized CSS and JS files, indicating performance optimization efforts. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO meta tags are properly set. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Performance is moderate with some room for improvement in loading speed and resource management. The technical stack is modern but would benefit from enhanced security configurations and updated compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with projectneverland.gr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review projectneverland.gr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.