Skip to main content

Security report for proglas.cz

PROGLAS · Media · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PROGLAS is a non-profit, non-commercial Christian radio station based in the Czech Republic, targeting informed families and the Christian community. The website serves as a digital platform for broadcasting, audio archives, news, and cultural programming, supported primarily through listener donations and fundraising campaigns. The station emphasizes a family-friendly and faith-based approach without advertising interruptions. Technically, the website is built on the Vizus CMS platform, utilizing modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and content quality, though accessibility features could be improved. Performance is moderate, with a clean and professional design. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and implements a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, it lacks visible security headers and a published security policy or incident response contact. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of WHOIS data reduces trust slightly but may be due to registry privacy policies. Overall, PROGLAS presents a trustworthy and professional online presence for a niche non-profit media entity. Strategic improvements in privacy policy visibility, security headers, and WHOIS transparency would enhance its security posture and compliance standing.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching proglas.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
85
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PROGLAS occupies a niche position as a non-commercial Christian radio broadcaster in the Czech media landscape. Its business model relies on donations and listener support rather than advertising revenue, which aligns with its mission and target audience. The station maintains partnerships with reputable organizations and platforms, enhancing its credibility and outreach. The website supports multiple languages and provides extensive content including program schedules, archives, and fundraising campaigns, indicating a mature digital presence. Growth indicators include active campaigns and integration with donation platforms. The partnership ecosystem includes media, charitable organizations, and cultural platforms, reinforcing its community-oriented approach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS and a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of a published security or incident response policy represent gaps. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure is present, limiting transparency for security researchers. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Darujme donation widgets introduces potential risk vectors that require regular auditing. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit media site but could be improved to meet higher compliance and resilience standards.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear and accessible privacy policy page to improve transparency and GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Create and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance trust and preparedness.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and improve accessibility features for compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
PROGLAS
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PROGLAS
Description
Web neziskové, nestátní, nekomerční rozhlasové stanice pro celou informovanou rodinu; staví na křesťanských základech. Nevysílá reklamu. Žije z podpory posluchačů.
Key services
Radio broadcasting, Online streaming, Audio archives, News and cultural programming, Fundraising and donation campaigns
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Darujme.cz donation widget, Vizus CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (commented out)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
excellent

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Active, content-rich website for a non-profit Christian radio station in Czech Republic
  2. No WHOIS data available, possibly due to registry restrictions or privacy
  3. Cookie consent banner present with detailed settings
  4. Multiple external partner domains linked
  5. No explicit privacy policy page found, but GDPR compliance is implied via cookie consent
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure
  7. HTTPS is enabled and used site-wide
  8. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing
  9. Website uses a proprietary CMS (Vizus CMS)
  10. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, physical address, and contact form
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, supported by the Vizus CMS platform. Integration with Google Tag Manager and Darujme donation widgets indicates a mature digital marketing and fundraising infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate but could benefit from optimization. The absence of visible security headers and limited accessibility features suggest areas for technical improvement. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but has room for modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 56/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with proglas.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review proglas.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.