Skip to main content

Security report for progetto.lv

Progetto · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Progetto is a Latvian-based interior design company specializing in innovative interior and architectural solutions. The website targets individuals and businesses seeking professional interior design services, offering a multilingual experience in Latvian, English, and Estonian. The business operates as a small service provider within the real estate sector, focusing on delivering tailored design projects. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Bootstrap frameworks, ensuring a modern and responsive user experience. The site includes contact forms, email, and phone contact details, enhancing customer engagement. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and CAPTCHA for forms but lacks advanced security headers and incident response information. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie policy and consent mechanism present but no clear privacy or terms of service pages. WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site is professional and functional but could improve transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching progetto.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Progetto occupies a niche position in the interior design market in Latvia, leveraging a professional online presence with multilingual support to reach a broader audience. The business model centers on service delivery in interior and architectural design, likely generating revenue through project contracts. The website's clean design and clear contact information suggest a focus on client acquisition and trust-building. The absence of detailed corporate information or certifications indicates a small to medium-sized enterprise. The lack of WHOIS transparency and privacy policy may affect credibility with privacy-conscious clients. The company could benefit from enhanced compliance and security disclosures to strengthen market trust and competitive advantage.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and CAPTCHA integration on forms to mitigate spam. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options, which are important for preventing common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is provided, which limits preparedness transparency. The absence of a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy further reduces security maturity. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data in the HTML content. To improve, the company should implement comprehensive security headers, publish security policies, and maintain up-to-date software to reduce risk exposure.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Publish a clear privacy policy and terms of service to enhance compliance and user trust.
  3. Add a security.txt file and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Progetto
Description
Progetto is an interior design company offering innovative interior solutions, targeting clients interested in architectural and interior design services.
Key services
Interior design, Architectural solutions, Project management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Bootstrap, Slider Revolution
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of CAPTCHA plugin for forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Fonts, Elementor
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress site using Elementor and Bootstrap for design.
  2. Multilingual support for Latvian, English, and Estonian is implemented.
  3. Contact information includes a phone number and email address, plus a contact form.
  4. No privacy policy or terms of service pages were found or clearly linked.
  5. Cookie policy and consent mechanism are present.
  6. No explicit security policies or incident response information found.
  7. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; domain registration details unknown.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond standard marketing tools.
  10. Website is well structured with good navigation and professional design.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using Elementor page builder and Bootstrap CSS framework, indicating a modern and flexible technical infrastructure. It uses jQuery and Slider Revolution for interactive elements. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for multiple languages, enhancing accessibility for diverse users. Performance appears moderate, with standard external resources loaded from the same domain and Google Fonts. No advanced hosting or CDN information was detected. The site could benefit from performance optimizations such as caching and minification. Technical debt appears low but maintaining plugin and theme updates is critical to avoid security risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with progetto.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review progetto.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.