Skip to main content

Security report for profsupport.cz

Energy · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 1 critical or high finding in Network security.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Professional Support is a B2B service and product provider specializing in professional washing, dishwashing, cleaning, and energy optimization solutions. The company operates primarily in the Czech Republic with partner sites in Slovakia and Hungary, and is a service partner of P&G Professional. The website is built on Drupal 10 with Commerce 2, indicating a modern and scalable technical infrastructure. It integrates multiple third-party services including Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for cookie consent management, and reCAPTCHA for bot protection. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, but the website content and compliance features suggest a legitimate business. Overall, the site is professional, mobile-optimized, and provides extensive cookie transparency, though contact information and legal pages could be improved.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of profsupport.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching profsupport.cz

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
90
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
88
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets professional clients requiring cleaning and energy optimization solutions, leveraging partnerships with P&G Professional. Its business model focuses on product sales and service provision, supported by an e-commerce platform. The presence of multiple language versions and related domains indicates regional market penetration. The use of advanced cookie consent and analytics tools reflects a mature approach to digital marketing and compliance. However, the lack of visible contact details and legal documentation may limit trust for some users. The company appears medium-sized with a consistent brand presence and a focus on energy sector services.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS, cookie consent, and bot protection via reCAPTCHA. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. The missing WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy and should be addressed. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced documentation and communication of security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Publish explicit security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
  3. Improve accessibility features to meet compliance standards and enhance user experience.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS registration information to improve domain trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Professional support - výrobky a řešení pro profesionální praní, mytí nádobí, čištění a úklid. Optimalizace energií a procesů. Servisní partner P&G Professional
Key services
Professional washing and cleaning products, Energy and process optimization, Service partnership with P&G Professional
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Commerce 2, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads, Facebook Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking
  2. Uses modern CMS Drupal 10 with Commerce module
  3. Implements cookie consent with detailed categories and third-party cookie disclosures
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML content
  5. No privacy policy page explicitly linked but implied by cookie consent
  6. No terms of service or security policy pages found
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, reducing domain trust score
  8. Multiple external analytics and marketing scripts loaded
  9. Mobile optimized and responsive design
  10. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Drupal 10 CMS with Commerce 2 module, indicating a modern and flexible platform suitable for e-commerce and content management. Integration with Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot shows advanced marketing and compliance capabilities. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. The technical stack is well-chosen for the business needs but would benefit from enhanced security headers and performance tuning. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 63/100Medium26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with profsupport.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review profsupport.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.