Skip to main content

Security report for profitroom.net

Profitroom · Hospitality · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Profitroom is a technology company specializing in direct booking solutions for hotels, resorts, and hotel groups. Their website presents a professional and modern interface focused on empowering hospitality businesses to increase direct bookings through advanced booking technology. The company leverages HubSpot CMS and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for privacy compliance. The website is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and includes a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, demonstrating a commitment to privacy and user experience. However, explicit privacy policy and terms of service documents were not found in the provided content, which is a compliance gap. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency but does not necessarily indicate illegitimacy. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy from a content and technical perspective.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of profitroom.net. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching profitroom.net

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
50
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Profitroom operates in the hospitality technology sector, targeting hotels and resorts with direct booking solutions. Their business model is B2B SaaS, providing technology platforms that enable hotels to manage bookings directly, reducing reliance on third-party channels. The company appears to have a medium-sized operation with a consistent brand presence and a focus on digital marketing and analytics. The use of HubSpot and VWO indicates a mature marketing strategy with data-driven optimization. The absence of explicit company registration or contact details on the homepage limits transparency but may be available on other pages. The company’s market position is as a specialized technology provider in the hospitality industry, focusing on enhancing direct booking capabilities.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a cookie consent banner powered by Cookiebot, which supports GDPR compliance. Security headers are not explicitly visible in the provided HTML, suggesting room for improvement in HTTP header security. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The use of multiple third-party scripts (Google Analytics, HubSpot, VWO) introduces a moderate tracking footprint, which is managed via consent. The lack of visible security or incident response policies and absence of a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file indicates limited public security transparency. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by implementing and documenting security headers and incident response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages linked from the homepage to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to demonstrate security maturity and transparency.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking technologies to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance with evolving regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Profitroom
Description
Supreme direct booking technology for outstanding hotels, resorts, and hotel groups
Key services
Direct booking technology, Hotel booking engine, Booking management solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics 4, Cookiebot, HubSpot CMS, Slick Carousel, Owl Carousel, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO)
Platforms
HubSpot CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular consent options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics 4, HubSpot Analytics, VWO Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, HubSpot Ads
Tracking pixels
HubSpot tracking, VWO tracking
Marketing tools
HubSpot Marketing, VWO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HubSpot CMS with multiple marketing and analytics integrations
  2. Cookie consent is managed by Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage HTML
  4. No privacy policy or terms of service links explicitly found in the provided HTML
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating possible privacy protection or domain registration issue
  6. No security challenge or WAF blocking detected
  7. Website content is focused on hospitality direct booking technology
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on HubSpot CMS and uses modern JavaScript libraries such as Slick Carousel and Owl Carousel for UI components. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics 4 for analytics and tracking, alongside Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site loads asynchronously many scripts from trusted domains, indicating a modular and performance-conscious design. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive CSS and font-face declarations for consistent branding. However, explicit performance metrics are not available, but the presence of multiple tracking scripts may impact load times moderately. Accessibility features appear basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and Twitter card metadata. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-implemented with room for performance tuning and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 83/100Low21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with profitroom.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review profitroom.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.