Skip to main content

Security report for proex2000.cz

ProEx 2000 · Real Estate · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ProEx 2000 is a Czech Republic-based company specializing in roofing and construction materials and services. The website presents a professional and well-structured platform targeting homeowners and construction professionals seeking roofing solutions. The business model appears to be a mix of B2C and B2B sales with a regional focus. Technically, the website employs common modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of WHOIS data and lack of explicit privacy and security policies on the site reduce the overall trustworthiness and compliance posture. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and documented incident response or security policies, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security measures to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching proex2000.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate and construction sector, focusing on roofing products and services. Its market position is likely regional with a medium-sized business scale. The website content and structure suggest a focus on product availability, branch locations, and customer service. The use of tracking and analytics tools indicates an interest in marketing and customer insights. However, the lack of WHOIS data and formal privacy policies may impact customer trust. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the data provided. The business targets homeowners and construction professionals, leveraging an e-commerce style platform for product sales and service inquiries.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options were detected, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. The site uses tracking pixels and cookies with a consent mechanism, but lacks visible privacy and security policies. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are present, indicating limited transparency in security management. The absence of WHOIS data further reduces domain trustworthiness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements in headers, policies, and transparency to meet best practices and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and legitimacy.
  4. Establish and disclose incident response and vulnerability disclosure procedures to improve security posture and customer confidence.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any potential vulnerabilities and improve SSL/TLS configuration.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ProEx 2000
Description
ProEx 2000 appears to be a company focused on roofing solutions, offering products and services related to roofs, construction materials, and related services primarily in the Czech Republic.
Key services
Roofing materials sales, Construction services, Product availability and branch locations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Seznam Analytics, noUiSlider, Swiper.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Seznam Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Seznam Analytics
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is a concern for domain legitimacy.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented, indicating some privacy compliance.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the main page content.
  5. Contact information is present but no explicit emails or phone numbers extracted from truncated content.
  6. Use of common tracking and analytics services detected.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown.
  8. Website content is professional and relevant to roofing and construction.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern JavaScript libraries including Swiper.js for sliders, noUiSlider for UI elements, and integrates analytics via Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel. The HTML structure is well-formed with responsive design considerations, indicating good mobile optimization. SEO is basic with proper meta tags but could be improved with structured data and enhanced accessibility features. Hosting provider and CMS are not explicitly identified. Performance is moderate, likely due to multiple external scripts. Technical debt appears low but could be reduced by optimizing scripts and improving security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with proex2000.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review proex2000.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.