Skip to main content

Security report for probit.com

ProBit Global · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ProBit Global operates as a comprehensive cryptocurrency exchange platform offering a wide range of services including spot trading, crypto buying, staking, launchpad participation, and various promotional events. The platform targets global cryptocurrency traders and investors, positioning itself as a large player in the finance and technology sectors with a professional and user-friendly website. The technical infrastructure is built on modern web technologies such as Angular and integrates analytics and marketing tools like Google Tag Manager and Quora Pixel, indicating a mature digital presence. Security posture is generally strong with HTTPS enforced and secure forms, though the absence of explicit security policies and incident response information suggests room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS data is a notable concern, potentially indicating privacy protection or registrar issues, which slightly impacts trustworthiness. Overall, the website is professional, well-structured, and safe for general audiences, but further verification of domain registration details is recommended for full trust assurance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching probit.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
60
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ProBit Global's business model centers on providing a multi-service cryptocurrency exchange platform with offerings that include buying, trading, staking, and launchpad services. The company leverages a global market approach targeting crypto enthusiasts and investors. Its competitive advantages include a broad market offering, comprehensive educational resources via its academy, and active engagement through trading competitions and airdrops. Revenue streams likely derive from trading fees, token listings, and staking services. The partnership ecosystem includes related domains such as its academy and customer support portals. The company's operations reflect a mature digital strategy with strong branding consistency and trust indicators, although the missing WHOIS data introduces some uncertainty about domain legitimacy.

Security posture

The security maturity level of ProBit Global's website is moderate to high, with HTTPS enforced and secure handling of user login and signup forms. The site uses modern frameworks and avoids exposing sensitive data in the HTML content. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response plans, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms such as a security.txt file indicates gaps in transparency and readiness. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed credentials were detected in the analyzed content. Compliance with GDPR is indicated through privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. To enhance security posture, the company should publish explicit security documentation and provide dedicated contact channels for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan accessible from the website footer or support section.
  2. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures and improve transparency.
  3. Enhance HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents, such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking pixels to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Registration number
306149790
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ProBit Global
Description
Unlimited access to trade and buy Bitcoin, Ethereum and 800+ altcoins in 1000+ markets.
Key services
Buy Crypto, Markets, Spot Trading, Convert, Launchpad, Trading Competitions, Airdrops, Stake, Auto Hold, Exclusive Offers
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 18.2.8, Google Fonts, Material Icons, Quora Pixel, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure login and signup forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Quora Pixel
Marketing tools
Quora Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual for a .com domain.
  3. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on main pages.
  5. Social media presence confirmed via Twitter link.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and tracking pixels for analytics and marketing.
  7. No adult or questionable content detected.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Angular 18.2.8, leveraging modern web standards and libraries such as Swiper.js for UI components and Google Fonts for typography. The presence of Google Tag Manager and Quora Pixel indicates integration of advanced analytics and marketing tools. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in loading times and script management. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable platform but could benefit from enhanced security header implementation and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with probit.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review probit.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.