Skip to main content

Security report for prizotlarju.si

Gostilna pri Zotlarju · Hospitality · Slovenia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gostilna pri Zotlarju is a small family-run hospitality business located in the village of Buje, Slovenia. Established in 2009, it offers traditional Brkini and Karst regional cuisine, seasonal and locally sourced ingredients, and 'a la napoletana' style pizzas. The business also provides accommodation with breakfast in newly renovated rooms. The website reflects a well-established local restaurant with a focus on quality food, family-friendly environment, and regional tourism. The site is professionally designed using WordPress and the Divi theme, with good mobile optimization and clear navigation. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Contact information and social media presence are clearly provided, enhancing business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching prizotlarju.si

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets local customers and tourists interested in traditional Slovenian cuisine and rural tourism. It leverages its location in the green Brkini region as a key market differentiator and offers additional services such as accommodation and event hosting. The website content and testimonials indicate a positive reputation and customer satisfaction. The business model is straightforward hospitality service with direct bookings for tables and rooms. There is no evidence of complex partnerships or subsidiaries. The company maintains a consistent brand image and uses standard digital marketing tools. Growth potential lies in leveraging regional tourism and enhancing online presence.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and implements cookie consent in line with GDPR. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not detected and should be added to improve security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The site lacks published security policies, incident response plans, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are recommended for improved security maturity. Overall, the security posture is good for a small hospitality website but can be enhanced with additional best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider integrating basic analytics to monitor traffic and user behavior while maintaining privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gostilna pri Zotlarju
Description
Družinska gostilna s prenočišči v vasi Buje, Vremska dolina, ki nudi tradicionalne brkinske in kraške jedi, domače in sezonske sestavine, pice 'a la napoletana', prenočišča z zajtrkom, ter je primerna za družine, zaključene družbe in večje skupine. Nahaja se v naravnem okolju z veliko aktivnosti v okolici.
Key services
Gostinska ponudba tradicionalnih jedi, Pice 'a la napoletana', Prenočišča z zajtrkom, Organizacija zaključnih družb in praznovanj
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.4.5, Divi Theme, Google Fonts, Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web hosting via Webicom registrar DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-maintained hospitality business site with clear branding and content.
  2. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity detected.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented in compliance with GDPR.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented and consistent.
  5. No terms of service or explicit security policies found.
  6. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond cookie consent.
  8. Site uses WordPress with Divi theme and standard plugins.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.4.5 using the Divi theme, a popular and modern CMS platform. It uses Google Fonts and the Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent plugin for privacy compliance. Hosting is managed via the Webicom registrar with custom name servers. The site shows moderate performance with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and alternate language links. There is no evidence of advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies. The site could benefit from performance optimization and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with prizotlarju.si. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review prizotlarju.si.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.