Skip to main content

Security report for privateondemand.com

Ravana LLC · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Private VOD Store, operated by Ravana LLC, is an established online adult video on demand platform with a domain registered since 2001. The website serves as an age verification gateway, ensuring compliance with legal age restrictions before granting access to adult content. The business is positioned within the adult media sector, leveraging partnerships with recognized entities such as AdultEmpire and DVD Empire to provide a broad selection of professional adult videos and award-winning customer service. The site employs modern web technologies including Vue.js, Bootstrap, and Video.js, hosted on infrastructure supported by Amazon AWS DNS services. While the site demonstrates good design quality and user experience, it lacks some advanced SEO and accessibility features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  4. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching privateondemand.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
40
Email security
40
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention privateondemand.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
10
Employees
0
Customers
10
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
10%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for privateondemand.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates a niche e-commerce business model focused on adult digital content sales. Its market position is strengthened by affiliations with AdultEmpire, a known builder of award-winning adult websites, enhancing credibility and reach. The target audience is strictly adults over 18 or the age of majority in their jurisdiction. Revenue streams likely include video sales and possibly subscriptions. The presence of multiple external domains related to adult content and e-commerce indicates a mature partnership ecosystem. However, the absence of direct contact information on the age gate page suggests a focus on streamlined user entry rather than customer support at this stage.

Security posture

The website implements basic security measures such as an age verification gate and uses HTTPS (implied though not explicitly confirmed in provided data). However, it lacks DNSSEC, security headers, and explicit cookie consent mechanisms, which are important for enhancing security and privacy compliance. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, indicating potential gaps in transparency and readiness. The WHOIS data is consistent and legitimate, supporting trust in domain ownership. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from improvements in domain security, headers, and privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Add a clear cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.
  4. Publish security and incident response policies to enhance trust and compliance posture.
  5. Include verified contact information on accessible pages to improve business credibility and user support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ravana LLC
Description
Online adult video on demand store offering a wide selection of professional adult videos with in-house award-winning customer service.
Key services
Adult video on demand sales, Customer service
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.2.1, Bootstrap, Font Awesome 6 Pro, Video.js, Vue.js (implied by vueApp references), Intersection Observer API
Frameworks
Bootstrap, Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Age verification gate
  • Noindex, nofollow meta robots tag on age confirmation page

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content age verification landing page.
  2. Contains clear age warning and legal disclaimers.
  3. No direct contact information or security policies found on this page.
  4. Uses modern front-end technologies and external analytics.
  5. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-term operation.
  6. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a minor security gap.
  7. No explicit cookie consent banner despite cookie usage mention.
  8. No security headers detected in HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with jQuery, Bootstrap, Vue.js, and Video.js for video playback. It leverages external CDNs for fonts and analytics, including Google Analytics and Plausible Analytics. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and uses lazy loading for images. However, SEO optimization is minimal, with meta robots set to noindex, nofollow on the age confirmation page, limiting search engine visibility. Accessibility features are basic, and no CMS is explicitly detected. Hosting appears to be on AWS infrastructure, providing reliable performance. Technical debt is low but opportunities exist to enhance SEO, accessibility, and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with privateondemand.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review privateondemand.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.