Skip to main content

Security report for prime-ckd.com

Chronic Kidney Disease Research · Healthcare · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Chronic Kidney Disease Research' serves as a specialized platform focused on disseminating research and information related to chronic kidney disease. It targets healthcare professionals and researchers, offering insights under the tagline 'Less pills, better pills.' The site is built on WordPress using the Enfold theme and incorporates modern SEO practices via the Yoast SEO plugin. It employs Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management, reflecting a commitment to privacy and regulatory compliance. However, the absence of visible privacy policy and contact information pages limits transparency. Technically, the site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and uses HTTPS with a good security posture, though it lacks some advanced security headers and formal incident response contacts. The WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy despite the professional presentation and content quality. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy for its niche audience but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching prime-ckd.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
20
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the healthcare sector, specifically focusing on chronic kidney disease research. It appears to be a small entity founded around 2022, with no parent or subsidiary companies identified. The business model centers on research dissemination and information sharing rather than commercial sales. The website's market position is niche, targeting a specialized audience of healthcare professionals and researchers. Partnerships with domains like nierstichting.nl and samensmaakmaken.nl suggest collaboration within the healthcare and research community. The site leverages digital marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Cookiebot to optimize user engagement and compliance. Growth indicators are limited due to the lack of visible business metrics or contact channels.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism that allows granular user control, indicating GDPR awareness. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits the site's readiness for handling security incidents. The missing WHOIS data is a notable concern, potentially impacting trustworthiness. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and establishing clear incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve transparency and regulatory compliance.
  3. Add visible and verified contact information including emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility and user trust.
  4. Create and publish a security policy and incident response contact details to demonstrate preparedness and compliance.
  5. Consider registering the domain properly or updating WHOIS information to improve legitimacy and trust signals.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Chronic Kidney Disease Research
Description
Less pills, better pills
Key services
Research dissemination, Information on chronic kidney disease
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Yoast SEO, GS Logo Slider plugin, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Avia Framework (Enfold theme)
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Reddit sharebutton
Tracking pixels
Google DoubleClick, Reddit pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible without WAF or security blocks
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with Enfold theme and Yoast SEO plugin
  3. Cookie consent implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage
  5. No privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in provided content
  6. WHOIS data is missing or domain not registered according to raw WHOIS output
  7. Website content is healthcare research focused and safe for general audiences
  8. External links mostly to trusted domains like Google, Vimeo, and Cookiebot
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Enfold theme and enhanced by plugins such as Yoast SEO and GS Logo Slider. It uses jQuery and Cookiebot scripts for functionality and compliance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO benefits. Performance is moderate with no critical errors detected. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. The technical stack is standard for small to medium-sized healthcare research websites, with opportunities for modernization in security and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with prime-ckd.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review prime-ckd.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.