Skip to main content

Security report for pribehy20stoleti.cz

Post Bellum · Media · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Příběhy 20. století' serves as an archival media platform focused on preserving and sharing stories from the 20th century, primarily targeting a Czech-speaking general audience interested in historical narratives. It operates under the umbrella of Post Bellum, a reputable organization in the media and cultural heritage sector, and collaborates with established partners such as Český rozhlas and Česká televize. The site offers radio broadcasts, an archive of stories, and related book sales, positioning itself as a niche cultural media outlet. Technically, the site is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with standard web technologies including jQuery and integrates marketing and analytics tools like Facebook Pixel and Google Site Kit. The site is mobile-optimized with a moderate performance profile and basic SEO and accessibility features. However, it lacks some modern security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are important for GDPR compliance and user trust. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries. The absence of security headers and explicit incident response contacts are areas for improvement. The WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, but the site’s association with Post Bellum and partner organizations supports its legitimacy. Overall, the website is a professionally maintained cultural media platform with moderate technical maturity and a solid security posture, though it would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices to strengthen user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pribehy20stoleti.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the media sector with a focus on historical storytelling and archival content. Its business model revolves around content dissemination via radio and online archives, supplemented by book sales through an affiliated e-shop. The target audience includes history enthusiasts and the general public interested in 20th-century narratives. The site benefits from strong partnerships with national broadcasters and cultural organizations, enhancing its market position as a trusted source of historical media content. Revenue streams likely include sponsorships, content licensing, and merchandise sales. The parent organization, Post Bellum, provides strategic oversight and brand credibility. Growth potential lies in expanding digital content offerings and increasing audience engagement through multimedia channels.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive information. The use of reputable third-party scripts is noted, though the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a dedicated security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and preparedness. GDPR compliance is partially addressed via an external privacy policy, but cookie consent mechanisms are missing. Overall, the site is secure for general use but should implement additional security headers and privacy controls to enhance protection and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Create and publish terms of service and security policy pages to improve legal clarity and user trust.
  4. Provide clear contact information for security incidents or data protection inquiries to support incident response readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to minimize vulnerabilities and maintain technical hygiene.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Post Bellum
Description
Archiv příběhů, na které se zapomnělo nebo mělo zapomenout.
Key services
archival storytelling, radio broadcasting, online content archive, book sales via e-shop
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, jQuery 3.7.1, Facebook Pixel, Google Site Kit
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Facebook Pixel, Google Site Kit
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. WHOIS data unavailable, likely privacy protected or unregistered
  2. Website is a media archive for historical stories related to 20th century
  3. No new user registrations allowed on signup page
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed
  5. Privacy policy linked externally on parent organization site
  6. No cookie consent mechanism present
  7. Uses WordPress CMS with standard plugins and Facebook Pixel tracking
  8. No visible security headers in HTML source
  9. No terms of service or security policy pages found
  10. External links mostly to partner organizations and media outlets
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with version 6.8.2, using jQuery 3.7.1 and integrating Facebook Pixel and Google Site Kit for analytics and marketing. The site loads external resources from reputable CDNs and font providers, ensuring reliable performance. The design is responsive and mobile-friendly, with a clean and consistent branding approach. However, the site lacks advanced accessibility features and some SEO optimizations could be improved. No hosting provider details were identified from the HTML content. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through optimization of scripts and caching. The technical stack is standard for media content sites but could benefit from modernization in security and privacy tooling.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pribehy20stoleti.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pribehy20stoleti.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.