Skip to main content

Security report for prfklinika.lv

PRF Klīnika · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PRF Klīnika is a specialized healthcare provider based in Riga, Latvia, focusing on advanced regenerative therapies using PRF (Platelet Rich Fibrin) injections. The clinic offers services in traumatology, aesthetic medicine, dentistry, and dental implantology, leveraging modern diagnostic tools such as 3D dental tomography. The website reflects a professional healthcare service provider with clear contact information and detailed service descriptions, targeting patients seeking innovative medical treatments. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and uses modern analytics and marketing tools, though it lacks some security headers and privacy policy disclosures. The security posture is generally good with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA implemented, but improvements are recommended in privacy compliance and security headers. Overall, the domain WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, but the website's content and structure indicate a legitimate and trustworthy business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching prfklinika.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention prfklinika.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for prfklinika.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The clinic occupies a niche market in regenerative medicine and dental surgery in Latvia, emphasizing PRF therapies. Its competitive advantage lies in combining advanced medical technology with experienced specialists. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on patient care and treatment efficacy. The presence of detailed staff profiles and modern equipment suggests a commitment to quality and innovation. The website's integration with Google and Facebook marketing tools indicates active digital marketing efforts. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified beyond the website developer's domain. The business appears small but specialized, catering to a local or regional patient base.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from automated abuse. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML source. The site lacks explicit security or incident response policies, which is common for small healthcare providers but represents an area for improvement. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no visible privacy or cookie policies, potentially exposing the business to regulatory risks under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with better policy disclosures and security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policy pages to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Consider publishing a security incident response plan or contact channel to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO metadata to improve user experience and search engine ranking.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PRF Klīnika
Description
PRF Klīnika offers advanced PRF (Platelet Rich Fibrin) injection therapies utilizing the body's own regenerative capabilities to restore damaged tissues and functions. Services include traumatology, aesthetic medicine, dentistry, dental implantology, and 3D dental diagnostics. The clinic emphasizes modern technology, experienced specialists, and comprehensive patient care.
Key services
PRF injection therapies, Traumatology treatments, Aesthetic medicine, Dental surgery and implantology, 3D dental tomography diagnostics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Flatsome WordPress Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy pages detected.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented including email, phone, and physical address.
  5. Uses modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No security headers detected in HTML source; recommend adding.
  7. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  8. Content is healthcare focused and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Flatsome theme and WooCommerce plugin, indicating e-commerce capabilities though the cart is currently empty. It uses jQuery and modern JavaScript libraries for UI and analytics integration. Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel are implemented for tracking and marketing purposes. The site loads asynchronously and appears mobile-optimized with responsive design. Performance is moderate, with some external dependencies on Google and Facebook domains. No hosting provider information was found in the HTML source. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection on forms. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy disclosures.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with prfklinika.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review prfklinika.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.