Skip to main content

Security report for previdenzacooperativa.it

Previdenza Cooperativa · Finance · Italy

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Previdenza Cooperativa operates as a specialized pension fund serving workers, members, and employees of cooperative enterprises in Italy. The website presents a professional image with clear focus on pension fund services, targeting a niche cooperative sector. The digital infrastructure is built on WordPress with the Divi theme, incorporating modern web technologies such as Google reCAPTCHA and Smart Slider 3 for enhanced user experience and security. The site is GDPR compliant with an implemented cookie consent mechanism and uses Matomo analytics for user tracking. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and standard security headers present, though explicit security policies and incident response information are not published. Overall, the website is trustworthy and well-maintained, though it could benefit from more transparent contact details and formal security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching previdenzacooperativa.it

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a cooperative pension fund, focusing on providing negotiated pension services to cooperative sector workers in Italy. Its business model revolves around pension fund management and member services. The website content and structured data confirm the company's legitimacy and sector focus. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a controlled communication channel, likely via contact forms. The use of modern CMS and compliance with GDPR indicates a mature digital presence. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly mentioned, indicating a focused operational scope.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS, security headers, and spam protection via Google reCAPTCHA. Cookie consent is properly managed, reflecting GDPR compliance. However, the lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The security score is solid but could be enhanced by adding formal policies and direct security contact channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and user trust.
  2. Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Include direct contact emails and phone numbers for support and security incidents to enhance communication.
  4. Improve website accessibility features to comply with best practices and broaden user inclusivity.
  5. Develop and publish terms of service to clarify user rights and obligations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Previdenza Cooperativa
Description
Previdenza Cooperativa is the negotiated pension fund for workers, members, and employees of cooperative enterprises.
Key services
Pension fund management, Member services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, Google reCAPTCHA, Smart Slider 3, Matomo Analytics
Frameworks
PHP (WordPress CMS)
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo Analytics, YouTube Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Pixel
Tracking pixels
Matomo Analytics, YouTube tracking, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Smart Slider 3
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration.
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and GDPR compliant.
  3. No explicit terms of service page found.
  4. Contact information is limited to a contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  5. Website uses modern WordPress theme Divi and includes Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. Website content is in Italian and targets cooperative workers and employees.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, a popular and flexible CMS platform. It employs Google reCAPTCHA for form protection and Smart Slider 3 for dynamic content presentation. Analytics are handled via Matomo and YouTube tracking scripts, indicating a moderate level of user behavior monitoring. The site loads CSS and JS assets efficiently with minification and caching. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO metadata is well implemented with Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider details are not explicit, but the SSL configuration and performance are adequate. There is no indication of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the provided content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with previdenzacooperativa.it. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review previdenzacooperativa.it.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.