Skip to main content

Security report for pressreader.com

Media · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PressReader.com is a digital newsstand platform offering subscriptions to over 7000 newspapers and magazines worldwide, enabling users to read content on multiple devices with a free trial period. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with a focus on media content delivery. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries and a custom CDN infrastructure, with resources loaded over HTTPS, indicating a baseline of secure content delivery. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain transparency and trustworthiness. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced but lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. Contact and incident response information are not present in the analyzed content, limiting user trust and compliance visibility. Overall, the site is functional and professionally designed but would benefit from enhanced transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pressreader.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the media sector, focusing on digital content subscription services. Its large catalog and multi-device access position it as a significant player in digital news distribution. The subscription-based model targets general consumers interested in newspapers and magazines. The lack of visible partner or subsidiary domains suggests a focused business ecosystem. The absence of detailed company information and contact details limits external validation but the platform's market presence and service offering indicate a mature business model with potential for growth in digital media consumption.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, ensuring encrypted data transmission. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. Incident response readiness cannot be assessed due to missing contact channels. Overall, the security posture is adequate for content delivery but requires improvements in compliance and security best practices to enhance user trust and regulatory adherence.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies clearly accessible on the website to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Publish clear contact information including security incident response contacts to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Obtain and publish WHOIS registration data or ensure domain registration transparency to improve legitimacy perception.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and update technical infrastructure to maintain performance and security standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Digital newsstand featuring 7000+ of the world’s most popular newspapers & magazines. Enjoy unlimited reading on up to 5 devices with 7-day free trial.
Key services
Digital newspaper subscriptions, Digital magazine subscriptions, Multi-device reading access
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, ES6-shim, Custom CDN (prcdn.co), WebResource.ashx (likely ASP.NET backend)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by https URLs in resources)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual for a commercial domain.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected in the provided HTML snapshot.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the HTML content.
  5. No social media links or security policy references found.
  6. Website uses HTTPS and loads resources from a custom CDN.
  7. No visible forms or user input fields detected in the provided HTML snapshot.
  8. No explicit security headers detected in the HTML content.
  9. No analytics or advertising scripts explicitly detected in the provided HTML snapshot.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front-end with ES6-shim for compatibility and loads resources from a proprietary CDN. The backend appears to use ASP.NET technology (indicated by .ashx resource handlers). Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and mobile optimization enabled. SEO and accessibility features are basic but present. There is no detected CMS or third-party analytics in the provided snapshot. The technical stack is stable but could benefit from enhanced SEO, accessibility, and security header implementations to reduce technical debt and improve user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pressreader.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pressreader.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.