Skip to main content

Security report for prehradanoveherminovy.cz

Nové Heřminovy · Energy · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website prehradanoveherminovy.cz serves as an informational platform for the Nové Heřminovy dam project, a regional infrastructure initiative aimed at flood protection and water management in the Moravian-Silesian region of the Czech Republic. The site provides historical context, project updates, and contact information, targeting local residents, government stakeholders, and interested parties. The business model is primarily informational and advocacy-focused, with governmental support evident in the content. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using common plugins such as WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution, with Google reCAPTCHA implemented for form security. While the site is mobile-optimized and presents good content quality and navigation, it lacks privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing key security headers. Overall, the site is legitimate and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching prehradanoveherminovy.cz

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The project is positioned as a key regional infrastructure effort with governmental backing, addressing flood and drought risks for approximately 6000 residents. The website acts as a communication channel for project progress, benefits, and official decisions, indicating a public-sector oriented business model. The absence of commercial activities or e-commerce features suggests a focus on public information dissemination. The presence of official contact details and historical references supports credibility. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly mentioned. Growth indicators include recent news updates and governmental decisions. The site’s ecosystem is limited to project stakeholders and local authorities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and Google reCAPTCHA is used to protect forms from automated abuse. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or security policy information is provided, indicating a gap in transparency and preparedness. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or security certifications. The site does not expose sensitive data in the HTML content. Regular updates and security best practices should be enforced to mitigate risks associated with WordPress and its plugins.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Establish and publish an incident response policy and contact channels for security issues.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to address known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and reach.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nové Heřminovy
Description
The website promotes the Nové Heřminovy dam project, focusing on flood protection and water shortage solutions for the region along the upper Opava river. It provides historical context, project updates, benefits of the dam, and contact information.
Key services
Information dissemination about the dam project, Updates on project status and benefits, Contact point for inquiries
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA, Slider Revolution, WPBakery Page Builder
Frameworks
WPBakery Page Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA implemented on forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based informational site about a regional dam project in the Czech Republic.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided in the footer with physical address, phone, and email.
  4. No visible security headers detected in the HTML content.
  5. Google reCAPTCHA is implemented, indicating some anti-bot measures.
  6. No advertising or analytics services detected beyond reCAPTCHA.
  7. Content is in Czech language and focused on public infrastructure and flood protection.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; content fully accessible.
  9. No social media links found in the HTML content.
  10. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) detected in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with common plugins such as WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution, indicating a standard and widely supported technology stack. The site uses jQuery and Google reCAPTCHA for frontend interactivity and security. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators found. Mobile responsiveness is good, supported by responsive CSS and media queries. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility is basic with no ARIA roles or landmarks identified in the HTML snippet. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified from the data. Technical debt appears low but could be improved by modernizing frontend libraries and enhancing security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with prehradanoveherminovy.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review prehradanoveherminovy.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.