Skip to main content

Security report for powerofwinning.be

Napoleon Games NV · Hospitality · Belgium

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Napoleon Games NV operates the website powerofwinning.be, offering casino gaming services primarily focused on dice games and roulette within Belgium. The company targets adult audiences interested in casino entertainment, providing both physical casino locations and online gaming options. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation, multilingual support, and a focus on promoting their gaming offerings and promotions. The business holds a moderate market position within the Belgian hospitality and gaming sector, emphasizing safety, fairness, and local presence. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript libraries, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for consent management. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well, with proper SEO and accessibility basics in place. The SSL configuration is excellent, ensuring secure communications. However, some security best practices like security headers and explicit incident response policies are missing. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good privacy compliance with GDPR-aligned cookie consent and anonymized analytics tracking. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of a terms of service page and incident response contact are minor gaps. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved with additional policies and headers. The overall risk assessment is low to moderate, with the main risk factors being the lack of some compliance documentation and security headers. Strategic recommendations include adding terms of service, security policies, and enhancing accessibility. The site is trustworthy, professionally maintained, and aligned with its business claims.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing Permissions-Policy header

      Controls browser features and APIs

      What to do: Implement a Permissions-Policy to restrict feature access

      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Permissions-Policy: accelerometer=(), autoplay=(), camera=(), cross-origin-isolated=(),…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No DKIM record found

      DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

      What to do: Configure DKIM with your email provider

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Medium

      SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

      SSL certificate expires in 42 days

      What to do: Plan SSL certificate renewal

Keep watching powerofwinning.be

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Napoleon Games NV is positioned as a key player in the Belgian casino gaming market, offering both physical and online casino experiences. Their business model revolves around entertainment services focused on dice games and roulette, targeting adult customers. The company leverages partnerships with creative agencies and job platforms to support operations and growth. Their digital presence is consistent and professional, supporting brand recognition and customer engagement. Revenue streams likely include casino gaming, promotions, and possibly online gaming fees. The company maintains a moderate size and focuses on compliance and user trust to sustain market position.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent with blocking mode, and anonymized analytics tracking. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, which could delay response to security incidents. GDPR compliance is evident but could be enhanced with more comprehensive documentation. Overall, the security culture appears proactive but can be improved with formal policies and technical headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear terms of service page to improve legal compliance and user clarity.
  3. Develop and publish an incident response policy and contact channel to improve security incident handling.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Napoleon Games NV
Description
Speel de beste Dice Games en roulette in een Napoleon Casino in jouw buurt, en voel de kracht van het winnen! Veilig, eerlijk en Belgisch.
Key services
Dice Games, Roulette, Casino promotions, Casino locations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Rellax.js, Cookiebot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with blocking mode
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear navigation and multilingual support (Dutch and French).
  3. Cookie consent is implemented with blocking mode, indicating GDPR compliance efforts.
  4. No explicit terms of service page found, which is a minor compliance gap.
  5. Contact information is limited to a phone number; no email or physical address explicitly provided on the main page.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn is evident.
  7. No visible forms collecting personal data on the homepage.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  9. SSL/TLS is properly configured and enforced.
  10. No suspicious or malicious domains linked.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with JavaScript, CSS, and HTML5, supported by third-party libraries such as Rellax.js for animations and Cookiebot for consent management. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are used for tracking with privacy-conscious configurations. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting details are not explicit, but SSL is properly configured. Performance is moderate, with some room for optimization. The CMS is not identified, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports business needs but could benefit from enhanced security headers and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with powerofwinning.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review powerofwinning.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.