Skip to main content

Security report for powerdiary.com

Zanda Health · Healthcare · Australia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Zanda Health is a healthcare technology company specializing in practice management software tailored for allied health practitioners. The company offers a comprehensive SaaS platform that automates and simplifies clinic operations including scheduling, billing, clinical notes, telehealth, and client communication. Positioned as a niche leader, Zanda Health emphasizes security and privacy, boasting ISO 27001 certification, which is a significant trust factor in the healthcare software market. The website targets health clinics and practitioners primarily in Australia but also serves multiple English-speaking regions globally. The business model is subscription-based SaaS with a focus on improving practitioner workflow efficiency and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching powerdiary.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
25
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Zanda Health operates in the healthcare technology sector, focusing on allied health practice management. The company is relatively new, with domain registration in 2024, indicating a recent launch or rebranding. It has established a credible market presence with over 1,000 reviews and partnerships reflected in dedicated support and academy subdomains. The business model is subscription-based SaaS targeting small to medium-sized health clinics. The company maintains a consistent brand identity and leverages multiple regional sites to address global markets. Trust indicators such as certifications and customer testimonials support its credibility. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled communication channels via forms.

Security posture

Zanda Health demonstrates a strong security posture with HTTPS enforced and ISO 27001 certification prominently featured. The site does not expose sensitive data in its HTML content and uses secure forms for data collection. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and some recommended security headers are not explicitly detected, which could be improved. There is no public security.txt or explicit incident response contact information, which are areas for enhancement. Overall, the security maturity is high for a healthcare SaaS provider, but some best practices could be adopted to further strengthen defenses and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  4. Provide explicit incident response contact information to enhance trust and readiness.
  5. Continue to monitor and update third-party libraries to avoid vulnerabilities and maintain compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Zanda Health
Description
Practice management software loved by allied health practitioners. One of the only systems to be ISO 27001 certified for the highest data security and privacy.
Key services
Practice management software, Calendar management, SMS & Email communication, Client management, Telehealth video calls, Clinical notes, Online forms, Payments & invoices, Claiming & billing, Reporting & analytics
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, Swiper.js, Google Tag Manager, Google Custom Search Engine, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ISO 27001 certification
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with email input only

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Custom Search Engine
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Strong focus on allied health practice management software
  3. ISO 27001 certification prominently displayed as a trust and security indicator
  4. Multiple regional versions of the site for US, UK, Australia, NZ, Canada, Europe, South Africa, and Global
  5. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  6. No direct company emails or phone numbers found in the visible content; contact primarily via forms
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter (X), Instagram, Pinterest, LinkedIn
  8. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, leveraging modern web technologies such as jQuery, Swiper.js for UI components, and Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. Hosting and DNS services are supported by Cloudflare, enhancing performance and security. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with fast loading times and comprehensive SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking. The technical infrastructure reflects a mature digital presence suitable for a SaaS provider in healthcare.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with powerdiary.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review powerdiary.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.