Skip to main content

Security report for portesdusoleil.com

Portes du Soleil · Hospitality · France

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Portes du Soleil operates a professional and content-rich website promoting a major alpine ski domain spanning 8 French and 4 Swiss ski stations. The site targets skiers and tourists seeking information on ski passes, accommodations, and live resort data. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager, Leaflet maps, and various UI libraries, delivering a good user experience with mobile optimization and SEO best practices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit privacy policies, terms of service, and security headers, which are recommended for compliance and protection. The WHOIS data is missing, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and registration transparency. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from improved transparency and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching portesdusoleil.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Portes du Soleil holds a strong market position as a major ski tourism domain in the Alps, offering integrated services such as ski pass sales and resort information. The business model focuses on hospitality and tourism services, targeting winter and summer mountain activity enthusiasts. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with consistent branding and good content quality. Advertising and tracking tools like AdRoll and Google Tag Manager support marketing efforts. Lack of visible contact information and WHOIS data transparency are areas for improvement to enhance business credibility.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits the site's readiness for security incidents. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be significantly improved by adding security headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and establishing clear incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to ensure legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Add standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and security incident reporting.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response procedures to improve security transparency.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Portes du Soleil
Description
Découvrez les Portes du soleil, un domaine composé de 8 stations de ski françaises et 4 stations de ski suisses ! Préparez vos vacances de ski dans les Alpes : hébergement, forfait de ski, webcam, accès, plan des pistes...
Key services
Ski resort information, Ski pass sales, Accommodation booking, Webcams and live info, Trail and bikepark maps
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Woody Theme, Google Tag Manager, Google Maps API, Leaflet, Swiper, Flatpickr, NoUISlider, Lazysizes, Moment.js, js.cookie, Rellax, iframeResizer, Plyr
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of consent framework for cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
AdRoll
Tracking pixels
AdRoll
Marketing tools
AdRoll
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich focused on ski tourism.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and may indicate recent registration or privacy protection.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented indicating GDPR awareness.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the analyzed content.
  6. Use of multiple modern JavaScript libraries and APIs for maps and UI.
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data; recommend adding for improved security.
  8. No signs of adult or NSFW content; content is family-friendly and tourism oriented.
  9. Advertising and tracking via Google Tag Manager and AdRoll present.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with a custom Woody theme and integrates multiple modern JavaScript libraries for UI and mapping functionalities. Google Tag Manager and AdRoll are used for analytics and advertising. The site loads multiple external resources from trusted domains and uses lazy loading for images to optimize performance. Mobile optimization and SEO practices are good, but accessibility features are basic. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Performance is moderate, with opportunities to improve load times and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with portesdusoleil.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review portesdusoleil.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.