Skip to main content

Security report for porntv.com

Porn TV · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Porn TV is an adult entertainment website offering free and premium high-quality pornographic videos across a wide range of categories and featuring numerous pornstars. The platform targets an adult audience exclusively and provides a large volume of content with a user-friendly search and navigation experience. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript, CSS, and asynchronous loading of analytics scripts such as Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile optimized and demonstrates good design and navigation clarity. However, the absence of WHOIS data and lack of visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies indicate gaps in transparency and compliance. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers and incident response contacts. Overall, the site functions well as an adult content platform but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching porntv.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the media sector focusing on adult entertainment, leveraging a freemium business model with both free and premium content offerings. It serves a large user base interested in diverse adult video categories and pornstars. The platform's extensive content library and search capabilities position it as a significant player in the adult video streaming market. However, the lack of registrant information and privacy policies may impact trust and regulatory compliance. No clear parent company or subsidiaries are identified, suggesting independent operation or privacy protection. The use of Google analytics tools indicates a focus on user behavior tracking and marketing optimization.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is used, ensuring encrypted communication, but no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security incident response contacts, limiting the ability to manage security incidents effectively. Privacy compliance is weak with no visible privacy or cookie policies, which is a compliance risk especially under GDPR. The absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency. Overall, the site should enhance its security controls and compliance posture to reduce risks.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy and provide security incident contact information.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve legitimacy and transparency.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and implement best practices for data protection and incident response.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Porn TV
Description
Porn TV is your source for free HQ porn videos. Porn TV offers more quality sex movies and hardcore porno than anyone. Tons of hot pussy to watch.
Key services
Free porn video streaming, Premium membership content, Search and browse adult video categories, Pornstar profiles
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage (implied by canonical URL https://)
  • Async loading of analytics scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a large adult video streaming platform with millions of videos and extensive categories.
  2. No WHOIS data available, raising concerns about domain legitimacy.
  3. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided content.
  4. No explicit contact information or security incident response contacts found.
  5. Uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking.
  6. No security headers or advanced security policies detected in the provided data.
  7. Mobile optimized with responsive design and search functionality.
  8. Content is explicitly adult and NSFW.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, including asynchronous loading of analytics scripts for performance optimization. The site is mobile responsive and includes structured data (JSON-LD) for organization and website schema, aiding SEO. External resources are loaded from multiple ttcache.com subdomains, likely a CDN or caching service. No CMS or backend technologies are explicitly detected. Performance is moderate with good SEO meta tags but lacks advanced accessibility features. The absence of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a large content platform but requires enhancements in security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with porntv.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review porntv.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.