Skip to main content

Security report for pornrape.org

Danesco Trading Ltd. · Media · Russia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pornrape.org is an adult entertainment website specializing in violent, forced, and rough sex video content. The site targets an adults-only audience and operates primarily through advertising revenue, linking to numerous related adult content partner sites. The business entity behind the domain is Danesco Trading Ltd., registered in Russia since 2017, indicating a small niche operation with moderate longevity. The website's content is explicit and lacks age verification or content warnings, which is typical for this type of adult content platform. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including jQuery, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager for tracking and analytics. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. There is no detected CMS or advanced frameworks, suggesting a custom or minimalistic implementation. Hosting details are not explicit but DNS servers indicate a Russian-based infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site lacks critical security headers, does not enable DNSSEC, and there is no visible enforcement of HTTPS. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, and no contact or incident response information is provided, which raises concerns about compliance and user data protection. The domain registration is partially consistent with the website content but lacks transparency in registrant details. Overall, the security posture is weak, and the site does not demonstrate adherence to privacy or security best practices. Given the explicit nature of the content and the lack of compliance and security measures, the site poses moderate risk to users, especially regarding privacy and data protection. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS, adding security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and improving transparency and compliance to enhance trust and security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pornrape.org

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the adult media sector with a focus on niche violent and forced sex content. Its business model relies on free content supported by advertising and affiliate partnerships with numerous related adult sites. The target audience is adults seeking explicit and extreme adult content. The company behind the domain is a small entity registered in Russia, with no visible subsidiaries or parent companies. The extensive network of linked partner domains suggests a broad affiliate ecosystem. However, the lack of clear business contact information and compliance documentation limits the site's credibility and may impact long-term growth and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The security maturity level of the website is low. Key vulnerabilities include absence of DNSSEC, missing security headers, no visible HTTPS enforcement, and lack of privacy and cookie policies. There is no evidence of incident response readiness or security frameworks in place. The use of third-party analytics without clear privacy disclosures further complicates compliance. These gaps expose the site and its users to potential data interception, tracking without consent, and regulatory risks. The business impact includes potential legal liabilities and loss of user trust. Immediate remediation is recommended to address these critical security and compliance gaps.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Provide clear contact information and establish an incident response process including abuse and security contacts.
  5. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Danesco Trading Ltd.
Description
Website providing free access to pornographic videos focused on violent, forced, and rough sex themes.
Key services
Adult video streaming, Categorized adult content, Search functionality for adult videos
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, jQuery 1.11.0, Google Fonts (Noto Sans), HTML5, CSS3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
antiadblock.info
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website hosts explicit adult content focused on violent and forced sex themes.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or security policies disclosed.
  4. Uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking.
  5. Multiple external links to related adult content partner sites.
  6. No DNSSEC enabled and no visible security headers.
  7. Domain registered in Russia with moderate age.
  8. No WAF or blocking detected; content fully accessible.
  9. Content and site design are basic with minimal professionalism.
  10. Adult content is explicit and targeted to adults only.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a basic technology stack including jQuery 1.11.0, Google Fonts, and Google Analytics scripts. The HTML structure is standard but lacks modern frameworks or CMS indications. Performance is moderate with some optimization for mobile devices. SEO is basic with meta keywords and description but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. The site relies on external ad networks and tracking services, which may impact user privacy. There is no evidence of advanced caching, CDN usage, or performance optimization beyond standard practices. Technical debt is moderate due to outdated jQuery version and lack of security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pornrape.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pornrape.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.