Skip to main content

Security report for pornpine.com

PornPine.com · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PornPine.com operates as an adult entertainment tube site offering free pornographic videos, including HD and full-length content. The site targets adult users seeking free streaming adult content and monetizes primarily through advertising networks such as ExoClick. The website has a basic but functional design with moderate mobile optimization and basic SEO practices. Technically, it uses common web technologies including jQuery, AJAX, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and basic age verification, but lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data and domain registration details raises concerns about transparency and legitimacy. Overall, the site functions as a typical adult tube platform but would benefit from improved security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pornpine.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a free adult video aggregator with a niche focus on pornographic content. Its business model relies on ad revenue from adult ad networks and user engagement through video ratings and favorites. The site has partnerships with several other adult content domains, indicating a networked ecosystem. However, the lack of clear company contact information, privacy policies, and cookie consent reduces business credibility. The domain's claimed founding year (2005) conflicts with the missing WHOIS data, suggesting possible privacy protection or obfuscation. Growth indicators and revenue streams are typical for ad-supported adult content platforms, but transparency and compliance gaps may impact long-term sustainability.

Security posture

The security maturity level is basic to moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and an age verification overlay is implemented to meet legal requirements. However, the site lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are critical for preventing common web attacks. No explicit incident response or security policy information is available. The absence of cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms indicates gaps in GDPR and related regulations adherence. No vulnerabilities such as exposed credentials or malware were detected in the content, but the lack of security best practices and WHOIS transparency reduces trust. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are minimal or absent.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Add a clear cookie consent banner and improve privacy policy disclosures to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Enhance age verification mechanisms to be more robust and legally compliant.
  4. Publish security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Conduct a thorough security audit to identify and remediate any vulnerable libraries or scripts.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PornPine.com
Description
PornPine.com is an adult entertainment website offering free porn videos and sex movies, including thousands of HD and full-length xxx videos.
Key services
Free porn video streaming, Video search and categorization, User account features (signup/login), Video rating and favorites
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Fancybox, Google Tag Manager, ExoClick Ads, AJAX, Cookies, SVG graphics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Age verification overlay implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
ExoClick, MagSrv
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content tube site with free porn videos.
  2. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy banner detected despite presence of terms page.
  4. Site uses HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers.
  5. Advertising is primarily via ExoClick and Google Analytics tracking is present.
  6. No social media or official company contact information found.
  7. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual for a domain with claimed long history.
  8. Age verification is implemented via overlay but is basic.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional web stack with jQuery and AJAX for dynamic content loading, supported by Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking and marketing. The site loads CSS and JS resources from its own domain, indicating self-hosting or dedicated hosting. Performance is moderate with lazy loading of images and responsive design for mobile devices. However, the site lacks modern frameworks or CMS identification, suggesting a custom or legacy platform. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal with standard meta tags and Open Graph data. The absence of advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pornpine.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pornpine.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.